What Is the User Experience Like with Popular IPTV Providers?

Overview of popular IPTV providers

Overview of popular IPTV providers


The user experience with popular IPTV providers is a topic of growing interest as more people turn to internet-based television for their entertainment needs. Read more about IPTV Reviews here. IPTV, or Internet Protocol Television, allows users to stream television programs over the internet, providing an alternative to traditional cable or satellite services. The appeal of IPTV lies in its convenience, flexibility, and often its cost-effectiveness. However, the user experience can vary significantly depending on the provider, and several factors come into play when assessing what it's like for users.


One of the key aspects of user experience with IPTV providers is the ease of use. Popular providers like Hulu + Live TV, YouTube TV, and Sling TV have invested heavily in creating intuitive interfaces that make navigation straightforward. These platforms often offer user-friendly layouts that categorize content into easily accessible sections, such as live TV, on-demand, and recorded content. The ease with which users can find, watch, and record shows significantly enhances the overall experience. Moreover, these platforms tend to offer apps that are compatible with a wide range of devices, from smart TVs to smartphones, adding to the convenience.


Content variety is another crucial element influencing user experience. Leading IPTV providers typically offer a wide array of channels, including local networks, popular cable channels, sports, and international content. This diversity allows users to personalize their viewing experience and access a broad spectrum of programming. Services like Hulu + Live TV and YouTube TV boast extensive libraries, including both live broadcasts and a vast selection of on-demand titles. For sports enthusiasts, platforms like FuboTV specialize in offering a comprehensive range of sports channels.


The quality of streaming is a vital factor that impacts user satisfaction. High-definition streaming, minimal buffering, and smooth playback are essential components of a positive experience. Popular IPTV providers often invest in robust infrastructure to ensure reliable service and high-quality video delivery. However, the quality can be influenced by the user's internet connection, which means that even with the best providers, experiences may vary based on individual circumstances.


Customer support and service reliability are also significant considerations. Good customer service can greatly enhance the user experience, especially when technical issues arise. Providers such as AT&T TV and YouTube TV are known for their responsive support teams and comprehensive help resources, which can help users troubleshoot problems efficiently. Additionally, the reliability of the service-meaning consistent uptime and minimal disruptions-is critical for maintaining user satisfaction.


Finally, pricing and subscription flexibility play a significant role in the user experience with IPTV providers. Many popular services offer tiered pricing plans that cater to different budgets and viewing preferences. For instance, Sling TV provides customizable packages, allowing users to pay for only the channels they want. This flexibility can make IPTV a more affordable and appealing option compared to traditional cable services.


In conclusion, the user experience with popular IPTV providers is shaped by a combination of ease of use, content variety, streaming quality, customer support, and pricing flexibility. As the demand for IPTV continues to grow, providers are likely to further enhance these aspects to attract and retain subscribers. For users, the decision often comes down to identifying which provider best meets their specific needs and preferences, ensuring a satisfying and enjoyable viewing experience.

Interface design and user navigation


In today's digital age, the way we consume television content has undergone a significant transformation with the rise of Internet Protocol Television (IPTV). As we explore what the user experience is like with popular IPTV providers, two critical aspects come to the forefront: interface design and user navigation. These elements are pivotal in determining how users interact with the service and the overall satisfaction they derive from it.


Interface design serves as the first impression for users when they engage with an IPTV service. A well-designed interface is not only aesthetically pleasing but also functional, allowing users to access their favorite content with ease. Popular IPTV providers understand the importance of a clean and intuitive interface; hence, they invest heavily in creating visually appealing layouts that are easy to navigate. For instance, a clutter-free home screen with logically organized categories and prominently displayed search functions can significantly enhance the user experience. The use of high-quality graphics and engaging visuals also plays a crucial role in drawing users in and keeping them engaged.


However, a sleek interface is only part of the equation. User navigation is equally vital in ensuring a seamless experience. Efficient user navigation means that users can effortlessly find, select, and play content without unnecessary steps or confusion. Popular IPTV providers often incorporate features like personalized recommendations, quick access to recently watched content, and customizable playlists to streamline the navigation process. Additionally, effective use of icons and labels, along with responsive and fast-loading menus, further contribute to a smooth navigation experience.


Moreover, the integration of user-friendly remote controls or dedicated apps for smartphones and tablets adds another layer of convenience. These tools offer users more flexibility in how they interact with the IPTV service, making it easier to browse through content or adjust settings without being tethered to a traditional remote control.


The user experience with popular IPTV providers is also enhanced by their attention to accessibility. Features such as voice search, closed captioning, and adjustable font sizes cater to a diverse audience, ensuring that all users, regardless of their abilities, can enjoy the service with ease.


In conclusion, the user experience with popular IPTV providers is largely defined by their interface design and user navigation. Providers that prioritize these elements can create a more engaging, efficient, and satisfying experience for their users. As technology continues to evolve, we can expect further innovations in this space, ultimately leading to even more refined and user-centric IPTV services. Whether it's through a visually appealing interface or intuitive navigation features, the ultimate goal remains the same: to provide users with seamless access to their favorite content.

Streaming quality and reliability


Streaming quality and reliability are two pivotal aspects that significantly shape the user experience with popular IPTV providers. As consumers increasingly pivot towards IPTV for their entertainment needs, the expectations for seamless viewing are at an all-time high. This shift underscores the importance of evaluating how these providers meet user demands in terms of quality and reliability.


First and foremost, streaming quality is paramount. It encompasses several factors, including video resolution, buffering times, and audio clarity. Most reputable IPTV providers strive to offer content in high definition, with some even pushing the envelope to deliver 4K streaming. This commitment to high-quality resolution ensures that users enjoy crisp, clear visuals that enhance their overall viewing experience. However, the actual quality experienced by the user can fluctuate based on their internet speed and the provider's server capabilities. Providers who invest in robust infrastructure and advanced compression technology often excel in delivering superior streaming quality, ensuring that users experience minimal downtimes and disruptions.


Reliability, closely intertwined with quality, plays a critical role in user satisfaction. An IPTV service that frequently freezes or disconnects can quickly frustrate users, leading them to reconsider their subscription. Reliability is often gauged by the consistency of service delivery, uptime, and the provider's ability to handle peak usage times without degradation in service. Popular IPTV providers that prioritize server reliability and use adaptive bitrate streaming can dynamically adjust to varying internet speeds, offering a more reliable viewing experience. Moreover, efficient customer support systems also contribute to perceived reliability, as they offer users reassurance that any issues encountered will be promptly addressed.


The convergence of quality and reliability effectively dictates the user experience with IPTV services. Users are looking for an experience that mirrors, if not surpasses, traditional cable television. This means minimal buffering, uninterrupted streaming, and high-definition content. Providers who can strike a balance between innovative technology and robust service delivery are more likely to succeed in this competitive landscape.


In conclusion, streaming quality and reliability are critical benchmarks for evaluating user experience with IPTV providers. As the demand for IPTV continues to grow, providers must continually innovate and invest in their infrastructure to meet and exceed user expectations. By doing so, they not only enhance user satisfaction but also pave the way for sustained growth and customer loyalty in the rapidly evolving digital entertainment space.

Channel selection and content variety


In the realm of digital entertainment, Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) has emerged as a popular choice for viewers who seek flexibility and a wide array of content. A crucial aspect of the user experience with popular IPTV providers is the channel selection and content variety they offer. This becomes a key determinant of satisfaction, as it can significantly influence a user's engagement and overall perception of the service.


Channel selection is often the first feature potential subscribers consider when evaluating an IPTV provider. Leading IPTV services typically boast an impressive spectrum of channels spanning numerous genres, including news, sports, entertainment, and international content. This extensive selection caters to diverse viewer preferences and ensures that users have access to both mainstream and niche channels. For sports enthusiasts, having access to live sports events across various leagues is invaluable, while news aficionados may prioritize having a range of both local and international news channels. The breadth of channel selection is, therefore, a pivotal factor that can make or break the user experience.


Moreover, content variety plays an equally significant role in shaping a user's interaction with IPTV services. Beyond traditional live TV channels, many providers offer on-demand content libraries that include movies, TV shows, documentaries, and even original programming. This expands viewing options and allows users to watch what they want, when they want, without being tethered to broadcast schedules. The availability of a vast on-demand library is particularly appealing to binge-watchers who appreciate the convenience of streaming entire series at their leisure.


Additionally, IPTV providers often incorporate features that enhance content variety through personalization and recommendations. Leveraging advanced algorithms, these services suggest content based on viewing history and preferences, making it easier for users to discover new and relevant content. This personalized touch not only enriches the viewing experience but also fosters a deeper connection between the user and the service.


However, it is essential to note that while channel selection and content variety are fundamental, the quality of the content delivery also matters. Users expect high-definition streaming without interruptions, as technical glitches can detract from even the most comprehensive content offerings. Reliable streaming quality, combined with robust content variety, ensures an immersive and satisfying IPTV experience.


In conclusion, channel selection and content variety are central to the user experience with popular IPTV providers. These elements not only define the range of entertainment options available but also influence user satisfaction and loyalty. As the IPTV landscape continues to evolve, providers that prioritize extensive channel offerings and diverse content libraries, alongside impeccable streaming quality, are likely to remain at the forefront of this competitive industry. For consumers, this translates to an enriched viewing experience that meets the demands of modern, tech-savvy audiences.

Customer support and service responsiveness


When considering the user experience with popular IPTV providers, one of the essential aspects that come to the forefront is customer support and service responsiveness. In a world where digital streaming has become a staple of entertainment, the efficiency and accessibility of customer service can significantly impact user satisfaction and loyalty.


IPTV, or Internet Protocol Television, offers a modern solution for streaming television content through the internet. As with any digital service, technical issues and user queries are inevitable. Hence, the responsiveness and effectiveness of customer support become critical. Users expect prompt and helpful assistance when they encounter issues such as buffering, subscription problems, or device compatibility. The ability of a provider to address these concerns swiftly can make or break the user experience.


Popular IPTV providers often strive to offer multi-channel customer support, including live chat, email, and telephone assistance. This variety ensures that users can choose the most convenient method for them, enhancing their overall experience. Live chat is particularly favored for its immediacy, allowing users to resolve issues in real-time without the frustration of long wait times. Email support, although slower, offers a more detailed channel where customers can explain their problems and receive in-depth solutions.


Another crucial aspect is the knowledge and professionalism of the support staff. Users appreciate when representatives are well-informed, courteous, and patient. Technical issues can be frustrating, and having a support team that handles inquiries efficiently and empathetically can make a significant difference. Providers that invest in thorough training programs for their support staff often see higher levels of customer satisfaction.


Service responsiveness also extends beyond direct customer interaction. Many IPTV providers maintain comprehensive online resources, such as FAQs, troubleshooting guides, and community forums. These resources empower users to find solutions independently, reducing the need for direct support and enhancing the user experience by making it more self-sufficient.


However, not all IPTV providers are created equal when it comes to customer support and responsiveness. Some may have limited hours of operation or insufficient staffing, leading to delays and frustration. Others might lack a user-friendly interface for accessing help, complicating the process of getting assistance. Users often share their experiences on online platforms, which can influence potential customers' decisions. Providers that consistently receive negative feedback for their support services may find it challenging to attract and retain users.


In conclusion, customer support and service responsiveness are pivotal to the user experience with popular IPTV providers. Efficient, accessible, and knowledgeable support not only resolves user issues but also contributes to a positive perception of the service. As the IPTV industry continues to grow, providers that prioritize these aspects will likely enjoy higher customer satisfaction and loyalty, setting themselves apart in a competitive market.

Pricing and subscription options


In the ever-evolving landscape of digital entertainment, IPTV (Internet Protocol Television) has emerged as a popular choice for consumers seeking flexibility and variety in their viewing options. As the demand for IPTV services grows, understanding the pricing and subscription options offered by popular providers becomes crucial for users seeking to optimize their viewing experience.


Pricing structures for IPTV services vary significantly across providers, often reflecting the diversity in content offerings, streaming quality, and additional features. Most IPTV providers offer tiered subscription models, allowing users to select a plan that aligns with their viewing preferences and budget constraints. Typically, these tiers range from basic packages, which include a limited number of channels, to premium packages offering an extensive array of live TV channels, video-on-demand content, and sometimes, exclusive access to international programming.


For those new to IPTV, free trials are often available, providing a risk-free opportunity to explore the service before committing to a paid subscription. This trial period is an excellent way for users to evaluate the quality of the stream, the breadth of the channel lineup, and the usability of the interface.


Monthly subscription plans are the most common pricing model, offering flexibility for users who prefer not to be tied down by long-term commitments. However, many providers also offer discounted rates for longer commitments, such as quarterly, semi-annual, or annual subscriptions. These options can be cost-effective for users who are satisfied with the service and wish to save money in the long run.


In addition to the standard packages, some IPTV providers offer add-on channels or services, which can be purchased separately. This a la carte approach allows users to customize their viewing experience by adding specialized content, such as sports packages or premium movie channels, to their base subscription. However, it's important for users to evaluate these add-ons carefully, as the costs can quickly add up.


The user experience with IPTV services is significantly influenced by the ease of use of the provider's interface and the reliability of the stream. Providers that offer user-friendly interfaces, with intuitive navigation and efficient search functions, tend to enhance the overall viewing experience. Furthermore, providers that ensure minimal buffering and downtime, while maintaining high-definition streaming quality, are more likely to satisfy users who value a seamless viewing experience.


Customer support is another critical aspect of the IPTV user experience. Reliable providers often offer multiple channels for customer service, including live chat, email, and phone support, to address technical issues or billing inquiries promptly. The availability of user guides, FAQs, and community forums can also contribute positively to the user experience by empowering users to troubleshoot issues independently.


In conclusion, when evaluating IPTV providers, users should carefully consider the pricing and subscription options in conjunction with the quality of the user experience. By selecting a provider that offers a balance of affordability, content variety, and reliable service, users can enjoy a personalized and immersive IPTV experience that caters to their entertainment needs.

User reviews and satisfaction ratings


In recent years, the landscape of television consumption has shifted dramatically with the rise of Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) services. These services, which deliver television content over the internet, have become increasingly popular as they offer a more flexible and often cheaper alternative to traditional cable and satellite TV. The user experience with popular IPTV providers varies widely, and user reviews and satisfaction ratings provide valuable insights into what consumers can expect.


One of the most praised aspects of IPTV services is the extensive range of content they offer. Users frequently highlight the vast array of channels available, often surpassing traditional TV services in terms of variety. Many IPTV providers offer international channels, catering to diverse audiences and allowing users to access content from around the globe. This extensive selection significantly enhances user satisfaction, especially for those seeking niche or international programming.


Moreover, the flexibility of IPTV services is a major draw for users. Unlike traditional TV services that require cumbersome installations and long-term contracts, IPTV providers often offer month-to-month subscriptions without the need for any special equipment beyond a compatible device and an internet connection. This ease of access and flexibility in subscription plans have received positive feedback from users who appreciate the ability to tailor their viewing experience according to their needs and budget.


However, user reviews also highlight some common challenges associated with IPTV services. A significant concern among users is the reliability and stability of the service. Because IPTV relies on internet connectivity, users with slow or unstable internet connections may experience buffering, lagging, or disruptions in service. This can be frustrating and impact overall satisfaction, particularly during live events such as sports broadcasts.


Another factor that influences user experience is customer support. Reviews often point out that while some IPTV providers offer excellent customer service, others fall short. Users value prompt and effective support when they encounter issues, and a lack of responsive customer service can lead to dissatisfaction. Hence, when choosing an IPTV provider, potential customers should consider the quality of customer support as an important factor.


Finally, the user interface of IPTV platforms plays a crucial role in user satisfaction. A user-friendly interface that is intuitive and easy to navigate enhances the viewing experience. Many users appreciate features such as search functionality, personalized recommendations, and the ability to pause and rewind live TV. Providers that invest in developing a seamless and engaging interface receive higher satisfaction ratings compared to those with clunky or outdated designs.


In conclusion, the user experience with popular IPTV providers is shaped by a combination of content variety, service flexibility, reliability, customer support, and user interface. While these services offer numerous advantages over traditional TV, potential users should weigh these factors carefully. By examining user reviews and satisfaction ratings, consumers can make informed decisions and select an IPTV provider that best meets their viewing preferences and expectations.

Overview of popular IPTV providers
"IPTV" redirects here. For Iowa Public Television, see Iowa PBS.
(Learn how and when to remove this message)

 

An IPTV set-top box connected to a TV set, designed to receive television from a service called Mview

Internet Protocol television (IPTV), also called TV over broadband,[1][2] is the service delivery of television over Internet Protocol (IP) networks. Usually sold and run by a telecom provider, it consists of broadcast live television that is streamed over the Internet (multicast) — in contrast to delivery through traditional terrestrial, satellite, and cable transmission formats — as well as video on demand services for watching or replaying content (unicast).[3]

IPTV broadcasts started gaining usage during the 2000s alongside the rising use of broadband-based internet connections.[2] It is often provided bundled with internet access services by ISPs to subscribers and runs in a closed network.[4] IPTV normally requires the use of a set-top box, which receives the encoded television content in the MPEG transport stream via IP multicast, and converts the packets to be watched on a TV set or other kind of display.[3] It is distinct from over-the-top (OTT) services, which are based on a direct one-to-one transmission mechanism.

IPTV methods have been standardised by organisations such as ETSI.[5][6] IPTV has found success in some regions: for example in Western Europe in 2015, pay IPTV users overtook pay satellite TV users.[7] IPTV is also used for media delivery around corporate and private networks.[citation needed]

Definition

[edit]

Historically, many different definitions of IPTV have appeared, including elementary streams[clarification needed] over IP networks, MPEG transport streams over IP networks and a number of proprietary systems. One official definition approved by the International Telecommunication Union focus group on IPTV (ITU-T FG IPTV) is:

IPTV is defined as multimedia services such as television/video/audio/text/graphics/data delivered over IP-based networks managed to provide the required level of quality of service and experience, security, interactivity and reliability.[8]

Another definition of IPTV, relating to the telecommunications industry, is the one given by Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions (ATIS) IPTV Exploratory Group in 2005:

IPTV is defined as the secure and reliable delivery to subscribers of entertainment video and related services. These services may include, for example, Live TV, Video On Demand (VOD) and Interactive TV (iTV). These services are delivered across an access agnostic, packet switched network that employs the IP protocol to transport the audio, video and control signals. In contrast to video over the public Internet, with IPTV deployments, network security and performance are tightly managed to ensure a superior entertainment experience, resulting in a compelling business environment for content providers, advertisers and customers alike.[9]

History

[edit]

Up until the early 1990s, it was not thought possible that a television programme could be squeezed into the limited telecommunication bandwidth of a copper telephone cable to provide a video-on-demand (VOD) television service of acceptable quality, as the required bandwidth of a digital television signal was around 200 Mbit/s, which was 2,000 times greater than the bandwidth of a speech signal over a copper telephone wire. VOD services were only made possible as a result of two major technological developments: motion-compensated DCT video compression and asymmetric digital subscriber line (ADSL) data transmission.[10] Motion-compensated DCT algorithms for video coding standards include the H.26x formats from 1988 onwards and the MPEG formats from 1991 onwards.[11][12] Motion-compensated DCT video compression significantly reduced the amount of bandwidth required for a television signal, while at the same time ADSL increased the bandwidth of data that could be sent over a copper telephone wire. ADSL increased the bandwidth of a telephone line from around 0.1 Mbit/s to 2 Mbit/s, while DCT compression reduced the required bandwidth of a digital television signal from around 200 Mbit/s down to about 2 Mbit/s. The combination of DCT and ADSL technologies made it possible to practically implement VOD services at around 2 Mbit/s bandwidth in the 1990s.[10]

The term IPTV first appeared in 1995 with the founding of Precept Software by Judith Estrin and Bill Carrico. Precept developed an Internet video product named IP/TV. IP/TV was an Mbone compatible Windows and Unix-based application that transmitted single and multi-source audio and video traffic, ranging from low to DVD quality, using both unicast and IP multicast Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) and Real time control protocol (RTCP). The software was written primarily by Steve Casner, Karl Auerbach, and Cha Chee Kuan. Precept was acquired by Cisco Systems in 1998.[13] Cisco retains the IP/TV trademark.

Telecommunications company US West (later Qwest) launched an IPTV service called TeleChoice in Phoenix, Arizona in 1998 using VDSL technology, becoming the first company in the United States to provide digital television over telephone lines.[14][15] The service was shut down in 2008.[16]

Internet radio company AudioNet started the first continuous live webcasts with content from WFAA-TV in January 1998 and KCTU-LP on 10 January 1998.[17]

Kingston Communications, a regional telecommunications operator in the UK, launched Kingston Interactive Television (KIT), an IPTV over digital subscriber line (DSL) service in September 1999. The operator added additional VOD service in October 2001 with Yes TV, a VOD content provider. Kingston was one of the first companies in the world to introduce IPTV and IP VOD over ADSL as a commercial service. The service became the reference for various changes to UK Government regulations and policy on IPTV. In 2006, the KIT service was discontinued, subscribers having declined from a peak of 10,000 to 4,000.[18][19]

In 1999, NBTel (now known as Bell Aliant) was the first to commercially deploy Internet protocol television over DSL in Canada[20] using the Alcatel 7350 DSLAM and middleware created by iMagic TV (owned by NBTel's parent company Bruncor[21]). The service was marketed under the brand VibeVision in New Brunswick, and later expanded into Nova Scotia in early 2000[22] after the formation of Aliant. iMagic TV was later sold to Alcatel.[23]

In 2002, Sasktel was the second in Canada to commercially deploy IPTV over DSL, using the Lucent Stinger DSL platform.[24]

In 2005, SureWest Communications was the first North American company to offer high-definition television (HDTV) channels over an IPTV service.[25]

In 2005, Bredbandsbolaget launched its IPTV service as the first service provider in Sweden. As of January 2009, they are not the biggest provider any longer; TeliaSonera, who launched their service later, now has more customers.[26]

In 2007, TPG launched their IPTV service in Australia after a limited beta.[27][28] By 2010, iiNet and Telstra launched IPTV services in conjunction to internet plans.[29]

In 2008, Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (PTCL) launched IPTV under the brand name of PTCL Smart TV in Pakistan. This service is available in 150 major cities of the country offering 140 live channels.[citation needed]

In 2010, CenturyLink – after acquiring Embarq (2009) and Qwest (2010) – entered five U.S. markets with an IPTV service called Prism.[30] This was after successful test marketing in Florida. Later in 2010, Bell Canada (a major division, if not the largest division of BCE) announced it would begin offering residential and business/commercial customers in Montreal, Quebec and Toronto, Ontario IPTV over a number of different modalities, including fibre to the home, fibre to the node and DSL. This flavour of IPTV would be packaged with other services and branded as "Bell Fibe," providing Canadian customers with everything from local analogue trunk connectivity (POTS), to DSL and fibre Internet to TV service via IPTV.[31] Bell further announced in the September 13th (2010) press release it would begin deploying fiber optic Ethernet to homes in Montreal and Toronto. Bell has since continued to install fiber optic Ethernet to homes (fibre to the home) across Ontario and Quebec, Bell Canada's two largest customer territories. Bell was very successful with the deployment of the Bell Fibe product offering. Many customers in Ontario and Quebec switched from legacy (coaxial) cable companies to Bell's Fibe product because of Bell's marketing around IPTV and their at-home wireless PVR offering. Bell's wireless PVR would permit customers to place a TV anywhere they wanted - as long as they had a power outlet. Bell Fibe TV commercials would show young families watching TV outside on the couch with large 70+ inch LCDs and their Bell Fibe wireless PVR.[32]

In Brazil, since at least 2012, Vivo has been offering the service Vivo TV Fibra in 200+ cities where it has FTTH coverage (4Q 2020 data) . Since at least 2018, Oi has also been offering IPTV under its FTTH service "Oi Fibra". Also, several regional FTTH providers also offer IPTV along with FTTH internet services.

In 2016, Korean Central Television (KCTV) introduced the set-top box called Manbang, reportedly providing video-on-demand services in North Korea via quasi-internet protocol television (IPTV). Manbang allows viewers to watch five different TV channels in real-time, and find political information regarding the Supreme Leader and Juche ideology, and read articles from state-run news organizations.

Markets

[edit]

Residential

[edit]
An IPTV set-top box on display from a Taiwanese provider

The global IPTV market was expected to grow from 28 million subscribers at US$12 billion revenue in 2009 to 83 million and US$38 billion in 2013.[needs update] Europe and Asia are the leading territories in terms of the overall number of subscribers. But in terms of service revenues, Europe and North America generate a larger share of global revenue, due to very low average revenue per user (ARPU) in China and India, the fastest growing (and ultimately, the biggest markets) is Asia.[33]

Deutsche Telekom Media Receiver 400 set-top box for an IPTV service in Germany

Services also launched in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Pakistan, Canada, Croatia, Lithuania, Moldova, Montenegro, Morocco,[34] North Macedonia, Poland, Mongolia, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia,[35] the Netherlands,[36] Georgia, Greece, Denmark, Finland, Estonia, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary,[37][38] Norway, Sweden, Iceland, Latvia, Turkey, Colombia, Chile and Uzbekistan.[39] The United Kingdom launched IPTV early and after a slow initial growth, in February 2009 BT announced that it had reached 398,000 subscribers to its BT Vision service.[40] A free IPTV service by the public broadcasters was launched in 2024 named Freely. Claro has launched their own IPTV service called "Claro TV". This service is available in several countries in which they operate, such as Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua. IPTV is just beginning to grow in Central and Eastern Europe and Latin America, and now it is growing in South Asian countries such as Sri Lanka, Nepal Pakistan and India.[41] but significant plans exist in countries such as Russia. Kazakhstan introduced[42] its own IPTV services by the national provider Kazakhtelecom JSC[43] and content integrator Alacast under the "iD TV" brand in two major cities Astana and Almaty in 2009 and is about to go nationwide starting 2010.[needs update] Australian ISP iiNet launched Australia's first IPTV with Fetch TV.[44]

In India, IPTV was launched by MTNL, BSNL and Jio in New Delhi, Mumbai and Punjab. APSFL is another IPTV provider in the state of Andhra Pradesh.

In Nepal, IPTV was first launched by NEW IT VENTURE CORPORATION called Net TV Nepal, the service can be accessed through its app, web app and Set-top boxes provided by local ISPs, another IPTV was started by Nepal Telecom called WOW Time in 2016 which can be accessed through its app.

In Sri Lanka, IPTV was launched by Sri Lanka Telecom (operated by SLT VisionCom) in 2008, under the brand name of PEO TV. This service is available throughout the country. Dialog TV has been available through the service since 2018.

In Pakistan, IPTV was launched by PTCL in 2008, under the brand name of PTCL Smart TV. This service is available in 150 major cities of the country.[citation needed]

In the Philippines, PLDT offers Cignal IPTV services as an add-on in certain ADSL and fiber optic plans.[45][46]

In Malaysia, various companies have attempted to launch IPTV services since 2005. Failed PayTV provider MiTV attempted to use an IPTV-over-UHF service but the service failed to take off. HyppTV was supposed to use an IPTV-based system, but not true IPTV as it does not provide a set-top box and requires users to view channels using a computer. True IPTV providers available in the country at the moment are Fine TV and DETV. In Q2 2010, Telekom Malaysia launched IPTV services through their fibre to the home product Unifi in select areas. In April 2010, Astro began testing IPTV services on TIME dotCom Berhad's high-speed fibre to the home optical fibre network. In December 2010, Astro began trials with customers in high-rise condominium buildings around the Mont Kiara area. In April 2011, Astro commercially launched its IPTV services under the tag line "The One and Only Line You'll Ever Need", a triple play offering in conjunction with TIME dotCom Berhad that provides all the Astro programming via IPTV, together with voice telephone services and broadband Internet access all through the same fibre optic connection into the customer's home. In 2020, Astro launched "Plug-and-Play", which uses Unicast technology for streaming TV.

In Turkey, TTNET launched IPTV services under the name IPtivibu in 2010. It was available in pilot areas in the cities of Istanbul, Ä°zmir and Ankara. As of 2011, IPTV service is launched as a large-scale commercial service and widely available across the country under the trademark "Tivibu EV".[47][48] Superonline plans to provide IPTV under the different name "WebTV" in 2011. Türk Telekom started building the fibre optic substructure for IPTV in late 2007.

Commercial and corporate

[edit]

IPTV has been widely used since around 2002[citation needed] to distribute television and audio-visual (AV) media around businesses and commercial sites, whether as live TV channels or Video on Demand (VOD). Examples of types of commercial users include airports, schools, offices, hotels, and sports stadiums, to name just a few.

Hotel television systems are the in-suite television content presented in hotel rooms, other hotel environments and in the hospitality industry for in-room entertainment, as well as hospitals, assisted living, senior care and nursing homes. These services may be free for the guest or paid, depending on the service and the individual hotel's or hotel chain's policy. Generally, these services are controlled by using the remote control.

Architecture

[edit]
A simplified network diagram for IPTV

Elements

[edit]

An IPTV head-end is a place where live TV channels and AV sources are encoded, encrypted, and delivered as IP multicast streams. Meanwhile, a video on demand (VOD) platform stores on-demand video assets and serves them as IP unicast streams when a user requests them. Sometimes, the VOD platform is located within the IPTV head-end. An interactive portal allows users to navigate within the different IPTV services, such as the VOD catalogue. A delivery network is a packet-switched network that carries IP packets, including unicast and multicast streams. Endpoints refer to user equipment that can request, decode, and deliver IPTV streams for display to the user. This can include computers, mobile devices, and set-top boxes. At a residential IPTV user's home, the home TV gateway is the piece of equipment that terminates the access link from the delivery network. Lastly, the user set-top box is the piece of endpoint equipment that decodes and decrypts TV and VOD streams for display on the TV screen.

Architecture of a video server network

[edit]

Depending on the network architecture of the service provider, there are two main types of video server architecture that can be considered for IPTV deployment: centralised and distributed.

The centralised architecture model is a relatively simple and easy-to-manage solution. Because all media content is stored in centralised servers, it does not require a comprehensive content distribution system. Centralised architecture is generally good for a network that provides relatively small VOD service deployment, has adequate core and edge bandwidth or has an efficient content delivery network (CDN).

A distributed architecture has bandwidth usage advantages and inherent system management features that are essential for managing a larger server network. Distributed architecture requires intelligent and sophisticated content distribution technologies to augment effective delivery of multimedia content over the service provider's network.[49]

Residential IPTV home networks

[edit]

In many cases, the residential gateway that provides connectivity with the Internet access network is not located close to the IPTV set-top box. This scenario becomes very common as service providers start to offer service packages with multiple set-top boxes per subscriber.

Networking technologies that take advantage of existing home wiring (such as power lines, phone lines or coaxial cables) or of wireless hardware have become common solutions for this problem, although fragmentation in the wired home networking market has limited somewhat the growth in this market.[50][51]

In December 2008, ITU-T adopted Recommendation G.hn (also known as G.9960), which is a next-generation home networking standard that specifies a common PHY/MAC that can operate over any home wiring (power lines, phone lines or coaxial cables).[52]

Groups such as the Multimedia over Coax Alliance, HomePlug Powerline Alliance, Home Phoneline Networking Alliance, and Quasar Alliance (Plastic Optical Fibre)[53] each advocate their own technologies.

Telecomms IMS architecture

[edit]

There is a growing standardisation effort on the use of the 3GPP IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) as an architecture for supporting IPTV services in telecommunications carrier networks. Both ITU-T and ETSI are working on so-called "IMS-based IPTV" standards (see e.g. ETSI TS 182 027[54]). Carriers will be able to offer both voice and IPTV services over the same core infrastructure and the implementation of services combining conventional TV services with telephony features (e.g. caller ID on the TV screen) will become straightforward.[55]

Protocols

[edit]

IPTV supports both live TV as well as stored video-on-demand. Playback requires a device connected to either a fixed or wireless IP network in the form of a standalone personal computer, smartphone, touch screen tablet, game console, connected TV or set-top box. Content is compressed by Video and audio codecs and then encapsulated in MPEG transport stream or Real-time Transport Protocol or other packets. IP multicasting allows for live data to be sent to multiple receivers using a single multicast group address.

In standards-based IPTV systems, the primary underlying protocols used are:

  • Service-provider-based streaming:
    • IGMP for subscribing to a live multicast stream (TV channel) and for changing from one live multicast stream to another (TV channel change). IP multicast operates within LANs (including VLANs) and across WANs also.[citation needed] IP multicast is usually routed in the network core by Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM), setting up correct distribution of multicast streams (TV channels) from their source all the way to the customers who wants to view them, duplicating received packets as needed. On-demand content uses a negotiated unicast connection. Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) over User Datagram Protocol (UDP) or the lower overhead H.222 transport stream over Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) are generally the preferred methods of encapsulation.
  • Web-based unicast only live and VOD streaming:
    • Adobe Flash Player prefers RTMP over TCP with setup and control via either AMF or XML or JSON transactions.
    • Apple iOS uses HLS adaptive bitrate streaming over HTTP with setup and control via an embedded M3U playlist file.
    • Microsoft Silverlight uses smooth streaming (adaptive bitrate streaming) over HTTP.
  • Web-based multicast live and unicast VOD streaming:
    • The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) recommends RTP over UDP or TCP transports with setup and control using RTSP over TCP.
  • Connected TVs, game consoles, set-top boxes and network personal video recorders:
    • Local network content uses UPnP AV for unicast via HTTP over TCP or for multicast live RTP over UDP.
    • Web-based content is provided through either inline Web plug-ins or a television broadcast-based application that uses a middleware language such as MHEG-5 that triggers an event such as loading an inline Web browser using an Adobe Flash Player plug-in.

Local IPTV, as used by businesses for audio visual AV distribution on their company networks is typically based on a mixture of:

  1. Conventional TV reception equipment and IPTV encoders
  2. TV gateways that receive live Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB) MPEG transport streams (channels) from terrestrial aerials, satellite dishes, or cable feeds and convert them into IP streams

Via satellite

[edit]

Although IPTV and conventional satellite TV distribution have been seen as complementary technologies, they are likely to be increasingly used together in hybrid IPTV networks. IPTV is largely neutral to the transmission medium, and IP traffic is already routinely carried by satellite for Internet backbone trunking and corporate VSAT networks.[56]

The copper twisted pair cabling that forms the last mile of the telephone and broadband network in many countries is not able to provide a sizeable proportion of the population with an IPTV service that matches even existing terrestrial or satellite digital TV distribution. For a competitive multi-channel TV service, a connection speed of 20 Mbit/s is likely to be required, but unavailable to most potential customers.[57] The increasing popularity of high-definition television increases connection speed requirements or limits IPTV service quality and connection eligibility even further.

However, satellites are capable of delivering in excess of 100 Gbit/s via multi-spot beam technologies, making satellite a clear emerging technology for implementing IPTV networks. Satellite distribution can be included in an IPTV network architecture in several ways. The simplest to implement is an IPTV-direct to home (DTH) architecture, in which hybrid DVB-broadband set-top boxes in subscriber homes integrate satellite and IP reception to give additional bandwidth with return channel capabilities. In such a system, many live TV channels may be multicast via satellite and supplemented with stored video-on-demand transmission via the broadband connection. Arqiva’s Satellite Media Solutions Division suggests "IPTV works best in a hybrid format. For example, you would use broadband to receive some content and satellite to receive other, such as live channels".[58]

Hybrid IPTV

[edit]

Hybrid IPTV refers to the combination of traditional broadcast TV services and video delivered over either managed IP networks or the public Internet. It is an increasing trend in both the consumer and pay TV markets.[59][60][61]

The growth of Hybrid IPTV is driven by two major factors. Since the emergence of online video aggregation sites, like YouTube and Vimeo in the mid-2000s, traditional pay TV operators have come under increasing pressure to provide their subscribers with a means of viewing Internet-based video on their televisions. At the same time, specialist IP-based operators have looked for ways to offer analogue and digital terrestrial services to their operations, without adding either additional cost or complexity to their transmission operations. Bandwidth is a valuable asset for operators, so many have looked for alternative ways to deliver these new services without investing in additional network infrastructures.

A hybrid set-top allows content from a range of sources, including terrestrial broadcast, satellite, and cable, to be brought together with video delivered over the Internet via an Ethernet connection on the device. This enables television viewers to access a greater variety of content on their TV sets, without the need for a separate box for each service. Hybrid IPTV set-top boxes may also enable users to access a range of advanced interactive services, such as VOD, catch-up TV, as well as Internet applications, including video telephony, surveillance, gaming, shopping, e-government accessed via a television set.

From a pay-TV operator's perspective, a hybrid IPTV set-top box gives them greater long-term flexibility to deploy new services and applications as and when consumers require, most often without the need to upgrade equipment or for a technician to visit and reconfigure or swap out the device. This reduces the cost of launching new services, increases speed to market and limits disruption for consumers.[62]

The Hybrid Broadcast Broadband TV (HbbTV) consortium of industry companies the establishment of an open European standard for hybrid set-top boxes for the reception of broadcast and broadband digital TV and multimedia applications with a single user interface.[63] These trends led to the development of Hybrid Broadcast Broadband TV set-top boxes that included both a broadcast tuner and an Internet connection – usually via an Ethernet port. The first commercially available hybrid IPTV set-top box was developed by Advanced Digital Broadcast, a developer of digital television hardware and software, in 2005. The platform was developed for Spanish pay TV operator Telefonica,[64] and used as part of its Movistar TV service, launched to subscribers at the end of 2005.

An alternative approach is the IPTV version of the Headend in the Sky cable TV solution. Here, multiple TV channels are distributed via satellite to the ISP or IPTV provider's point of presence (POP) for IP-encapsulated distribution to individual subscribers as required by each subscriber. This can provide a huge selection of channels to subscribers without overburdening incoming Internet to the POP, and enables an IPTV service to be offered to small or remote operators outside the reach of terrestrial high-speed WAN connection. An example is a network combining fibre and satellite distribution via an SES New Skies satellite of 95 channels to Latin America and the Caribbean, operated by IPTV Americas.[65][needs update]

Advantages

[edit]

The Internet protocol-based platform offers significant advantages, including the ability to integrate television with other IP-based services like high-speed Internet access and VoIP.

A switched IP network also allows for the delivery of significantly more content and functionality. In a typical TV or satellite network, using broadcast video technology, all the content constantly flows downstream to each customer, and the customer switches the content at the set-top box. The customer can select from as many choices as the telecomms, cable or satellite company can stuff into the pipe flowing into the home. A switched IP network works differently. Content remains in the network, and only the content the customer selects is sent into the customer's home. That frees up bandwidth, and the customer's choice is less restricted by the size of the pipe into the home.

Interactivity

[edit]

An IP-based platform also allows significant opportunities to make the TV viewing experience more interactive and personalised. The provider may, for example, include an interactive programme guide that allows viewers to search for content by title or actor's name, or a picture-in-picture functionality that allows them to channel surf without leaving the programme they're watching. Viewers may be able to look up a player's stats while watching a sports game or control the camera angle. They also may be able to access photos or music from their PC on their television, use a wireless phone to schedule a recording of their favourite show, or even adjust parental controls so their child can watch a documentary for a school report, while they're away from home.

A feedback channel from the viewer to the provider is required for this interactivity. Terrestrial, satellite, and some cable networks for television do not feature a feedback channel and thus don't allow interactivity. However, interactivity with those networks can be possible by combining TV networks with data networks such as the Internet or a mobile communication network.

Video on demand

[edit]

IPTV technology is used for video on demand (VOD),[66] which permits a customer to browse an online programme or film catalogue, to watch trailers and to then select a program. The playout of the selected item starts nearly instantaneously on the customer's TV or PC.

Technically, when the customer selects the program, a point-to-point unicast connection is set up between the customer's decoder (set-top box or PC) and the delivering streaming server. The signalling for the trick mode functionality (pause, slow-motion, wind/rewind etc.) may be communicated using, for instance, RTSP.

In an attempt to avoid content piracy, the VOD content is usually encrypted and digital rights management may be applied. A film that is chosen, for example, may be playable for 24 hours following payment, after which time it becomes unavailable.

IPTV-based converged services

[edit]

Another advantage is the opportunity for integration and convergence. This opportunity is amplified when using IMS-based solutions.[67] Converged services implies interaction of existing services in a seamless manner to create new value-added services. One example is on-screen caller ID, getting caller ID on a TV, and the ability to handle the call (send it to voice mail, etc.). IP-based services help to provide consumers anytime and anywhere access to content over their televisions, PCs, and mobile device, and to integrate services and content to tie them together. Within businesses and institutions, IPTV eliminates the need to run a parallel infrastructure to deliver live and stored video services.

Limitations

[edit]

IPTV is sensitive to packet loss and delays. An IPTV channel has a minimum bandwidth requirement. Some systems are able to adapt to lower available bandwidth by reducing picture quality.

Although a few countries have very high-speed broadband-enabled populations,[a] in other countries legacy networks struggle to provide 3–5 Mbit/s[68][needs update] and so simultaneous use of IPTV, VOIP and Internet access may not be viable. The last-mile delivery for IPTV usually has a bandwidth restriction that only allows a small number of simultaneous TV channel streams – typically from one to three – to be delivered.[69]

Latency

[edit]

The network delay inherent in the use of satellite Internet access is often held up as a reason why satellites cannot be successfully used for IPTV. In practice, however, delay is not an important factor for IPTV, since it is a service that does not require real-time transmission, as is the case with telephony or videoconferencing services. It is the delay of response to requests to change channel, display an EPG, etc. that most affects customers’ perceived quality of service.

Existing video transmission systems of both analogue and digital formats already introduce known quantifiable delays. Existing DVB TV channels that simulcast by both terrestrial and satellite transmissions experience the same 0.25-second delay difference between the two services with no detrimental effect, and it goes unnoticed by viewers.

Bandwidth requirements

[edit]
Bandwidth capacity for simultaneously two HDTV streams, two SD streams, additional to HSD and voice

Digital video is a sequence of digital images, called frames, each made up of pixels or picture elements. Three bytes are typically used to represent the colour of the high quality image.

Movies use 24 frames per second, North America television uses approximately 30 frames per second where the Europe television frame rate is 25 frames per second. Each digital video has dimensions width and height; SDTV is 720 × 480 pixels, HDTV uses up to 1920 × 1080 pixels.

For checking the bandwidth requirements, you need to dimension your IPTV service, such as defining number of SD and HD TV channels, number of planned subscribers, VOD and nPVR concurrency. Based on these, you can calculate required bandwidth on each DSL line, in access network and in core IP network.[70]

Privacy implications

[edit]

Due to limitations in bandwidth, an IPTV channel is delivered to the user one at a time. Changing a channel requires requesting the head-end server to provide a different broadcast stream, much like VOD.[b] This could enable the service provider to accurately track each and every programme watched and the duration of watching for each viewer. In conjunction with regulatory differences between IPTV and cable TV, this tracking could pose a threat to privacy according to critics.[71] For IP multicast scenarios, since a particular multicast group (TV channel) needs to be requested before it can be viewed, the same privacy concerns apply.

Vendors

[edit]

Some major telecoms vendors are active in this space, notably Accenture (Accenture Video Solution), Alcatel-Lucent (sometimes working with Movistar TV), Ericsson (notably since acquiring Tandberg Television), Huawei, NEC, PTCL Smart TV, Sri Lanka Telecom, Thomson, and ZTE, as are some IT houses, led by Microsoft. Miami-based AlphaOTT, Tokyo-based The New Media Group, Malaysian-based Select-TV, Oslo/Norway-based SnapTV, and California-based UTStarcom, Inc. also offer end-to-end networking infrastructure for IPTV-based services, and Hong Kong-based BNS Ltd. provides turnkey open platform IPTV technology solutions. Others include Movistar TV and PCCW.

Google Fiber offers an IPTV service in various US cities which includes up to 1 Gigabit-speed internet and over 290 channels depending on package via the fibre optic network being built out in Kansas City Kansas and Kansas City Missouri.

Many of these IPTV solution vendors participated in the biennial Multiservice Switching Forum Interoperability 2008 (GMI) event which was coordinated by the MultiService Forum (MSF) at five sites worldwide from 20 to 31 October 2008. Test equipment vendors including Netrounds, Codenomicon, Empirix, Ixia, Mu Dynamics, and Spirent joined solution vendors such as the companies listed above in one of the largest IPTV proving grounds ever deployed.

Service bundling

[edit]

For residential users, IPTV is often provided in conjunction with VOD and may be bundled with Internet services such as Internet access and voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) telecommunications services. Commercial bundling of IPTV, VoIP and Internet access is sometimes referred to in marketing as triple play service. When these three are offered with cellular service, the combined service may be referred to as quadruple play.

Regulation

[edit]

Historically, cable TV operators have been regulated differently from telecommunication operators. As IPTV allows TV and VOD to be transmitted over the Internet, new regulatory issues arise.[72] Professor Eli M. Noam highlights in his report "TV or Not TV: Three Screens, One Regulation?" some of the key challenges with sector-specific regulation that is becoming obsolete due to convergence in this field.[73]

See also

[edit]
  • Content delivery network
  • DVB-IPTV
  • Over-the-top media service
  • P2PTV
  • SAT>IP
  • Software as a service
  • Streaming television

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ South Korea, for instance, has 6 million homes benefiting from a minimum connection speed of 100 Mbit/s.
  2. ^ For VOD, the stream is delivered using unicast whereas IPTV typically uses multicast.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Jackson, Mark (22 August 2021). "Sky UK Allegedly Trial Broadband TV Service Without Satellite UPDATE". ISPreview UK. Retrieved 1 July 2024.
  2. ^ a b Ferguson, Andrew (November 2005). "IPTV the new buzz word in the UK broadband industry". Think Broadband.
  3. ^ a b Sharma, Ashok. "What is IPTV". Engineers Garage. Retrieved 1 July 2024.
  4. ^ Moro-Visconti, Roberto (17 April 2021). Startup Valuation: From Strategic Business Planning to Digital Networking. Springer. ISBN 9783030716080.
  5. ^ "Login Page" (PDF).
  6. ^ "Japan standardisation for IPTV services". 26 June 2008. Retrieved 1 July 2024.
  7. ^ "IPTV overtakes pay satellite TV in Western Europe". Broadband TV News. 12 April 2016. Retrieved 1 July 2024.
  8. ^ "IPTV Standardization on Track Say Industry Experts". ITU-T Newslog. 27 October 2006. Archived from the original on 16 September 2011. Retrieved 17 January 2012.
  9. ^ "ATIS IPTV Exploratory Group Report and Recommendation to the TOPS Council" (PDF). Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions. July 2006. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 January 2012. Retrieved 17 January 2012. cite journal: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  10. ^ a b Lea, William (1994). Video on demand: Research Paper 94/68. House of Commons Library. Archived from the original on 20 September 2019. Retrieved 20 September 2019.
  11. ^ Ghanbari, Mohammed (2003). Standard Codecs: Image Compression to Advanced Video Coding. Institution of Engineering and Technology. pp. 1–2. ISBN 9780852967102.
  12. ^ Li, Jian Ping (2006). Proceedings of the International Computer Conference 2006 on Wavelet Active Media Technology and Information Processing: Chongqing, China, 29-31 August 2006. World Scientific. p. 847. ISBN 9789812709998.
  13. ^ "Summary of Acquisitions". Cisco. Archived from the original on 21 August 2007.
  14. ^ Gonderinger, Lisa. "US West quietly leads digital cable market". The Arizona Republic. No. 20 May 1998. Archived from the original on 8 June 2020. Retrieved 8 June 2020.
  15. ^ "FIFTH ANNUAL REPORT" (PDF). Federal Communications Commission. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 October 2011. Retrieved 8 June 2020.
  16. ^ O'Shea, Dan (10 October 2008). "Qwest finally phasing out Choice TV". FierceVideo. Archived from the original on 8 June 2020. Retrieved 8 June 2020.
  17. ^ Hart, Timothy (15 February 1998). "KCTU-TV earns a place in television, Internet history". Archived from the original on 7 March 2007.
  18. ^ "Kingston pulls plug on IPTV service". theregister.co.uk. Archived from the original on 13 November 2017. Retrieved 25 April 2018.
  19. ^ KIT Kingston Interactive Television Archived 5 September 2015 at the Wayback Machine. Kitv.co.uk. Retrieved on 12 March 2014.
  20. ^ "NBTel leading the way in North America with Aliant's new interactive information and entertainment television service – VibeVision" (Press release). Archived from the original on 22 January 2009.
  21. ^ "Bruncor launches ImagicTV". www.thefreelibrary.com (Press release). 9 June 1998. Archived from the original on 8 October 2018. Retrieved 25 April 2018.
  22. ^ "Aliant Telecom Launches New Television Technology in Halifax" (Press release). Archived from the original on 17 June 2008.
  23. ^ "Alcatel Acquires iMagic TV". ITBusiness.ca. 2003. Archived from the original on 14 September 2016. Retrieved 7 October 2018.
  24. ^ "Lucent Technologies Introduces First Commercial IP Video Over DSL Solution, Business Net". Business Wire. 10 April 2002. Archived from the original on 6 June 2013. Retrieved 4 February 2008.
  25. ^ "Amino selected for first HD IPTV deployment in USA". Archived from the original on 27 August 2016. Retrieved 16 August 2016.
  26. ^ "Bredbandsbolaget rustar på ip-tv" [Bredbandsbolaget is mobilizing for IP TV] (in Swedish). Archived from the original on 27 February 2009.
  27. ^ "TPG IPTV Officially Launched! - TPG". Whirlpool.net.au. Retrieved 1 June 2023.
  28. ^ "TPG - IPTV". 13 March 2023. Archived from the original on 3 July 2007. Retrieved 1 June 2023.
  29. ^ "Internet Providers - Compare Broadband Deals from 44 Providers - WhistleOut". broadband.theage.com.au. Archived from the original on 3 March 2012. Retrieved 25 April 2018.
  30. ^ "CenturyLink Quietly Launches Prism IPTV Product". Telecompetitor.com. Archived from the original on 6 July 2017. Retrieved 15 June 2013.
  31. ^ "Bell Fibe TV launches in Toronto and Montréal". www.bce.ca. Retrieved 25 June 2022.
  32. ^ "Fibe TV - Home | Bell Canada". www.bell.ca. Retrieved 25 June 2022.
  33. ^ "IPTV Global Forecast (2008–2013)". International Television Expert Group. Archived from the original on 1 June 2010.
  34. ^ "Orange consacré "Meilleur réseau mobile" au Maroc". Le Matin (in French). 5 October 2018. Retrieved 11 October 2019.
  35. ^ "BH Telecom: BH Telecom - početna". www.bhtelecom.ba. Archived from the original on 29 June 2017. Retrieved 25 April 2018.
  36. ^ "Interactieve TV - Wat is Interactieve TV? - KPN". www.kpn.com. Archived from the original on 6 December 2009. Retrieved 25 April 2018.
  37. ^ T-Home.hu Archived 17 September 2009 at the Wayback Machine
  38. ^ InviTV.hu[permanent dead link‍]
  39. ^ "UZONLINE - Тарифы на Интернет". uzonline.uz. Archived from the original on 12 January 2018. Retrieved 25 April 2018.
  40. ^ "Media + Networks". www.iptv-news.com. Archived from the original on 22 July 2009. Retrieved 25 April 2018.
  41. ^ "Salad days," Archived 3 May 2008 at the Wayback Machine Chris Dziadul, Broadband TV News, 2 May 2008
  42. ^ Delivering IPTV System to Kazakhtelecom Archived 10 November 2009 at the Wayback Machine Article from the IPTV industrial portal
  43. ^ iD TV services for broadband subscribers in Kazakhstan Archived 8 October 2011 at the Wayback Machine Kazakhtelecom JSC – iD TV service for Home users
  44. ^ iiNet's Age of Terabyte Archived 10 October 2010 at the Wayback Machine PDF from iiNet press release 18 August 2010
  45. ^ "PLDT HOME leads fixed broadband market, adds six times more subscribers than competition". PLDT Incorporated. 25 May 2016. Archived from the original on 29 May 2016. Retrieved 17 February 2016.
  46. ^ "High Speed Fiber Optic Internet Connection | PLDT HOME". Archived from the original on 26 January 2017. Retrieved 17 February 2017.
  47. ^ "Turkey's iptv, Tivibu Ev is on air" ntvmsnbc.com, 23 February 2011.
  48. ^ "Tivibu Ev's Official Homepage" tivibu.com/ev, 13 March 2011. Archived 24 February 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  49. ^ "inwf.com". www.inwf.com. Archived from the original on 22 December 2016. Retrieved 25 April 2018.
  50. ^ SmartGridToday.com. "5 stories in 2 minutes". www.smartgridtoday.com. Archived from the original on 10 March 2012. Retrieved 25 April 2018.
  51. ^ HomeGrid Forum Blog – Why do we need a unified standard at all? Archived 22 June 2009 at the Wayback Machine
  52. ^ New global standard for fully networked home Archived 21 February 2009 at the Wayback Machine, ITU-T Press Release
  53. ^ Quasar POF alliance Archived 10 January 2016 at the Wayback Machine
  54. ^ "Search & Browse Standards". pda.etsi.org. Archived from the original on 28 July 2013. Retrieved 25 April 2018.
  55. ^ "IMS-based IPTV services – architecture and implementation" (PDF). city.ac.uk. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 April 2016. Retrieved 25 April 2018.
  56. ^ Berlocher, Greg and Freyer, Dan. "IP And Satellite: Communications Worlds Merging" Via Satellite January 2009 p 24–28
  57. ^ Taga, Karim. "Hybrid delivery of content for IPTV" InterComms Issue 11 August 2008 p 13–14
  58. ^ Holmes, Mark (September 2008). "Broadcast 2.0: The Changing Scene In Europe". Via Satellite. pp. 20–25.
  59. ^ 19.46 Europe/London (14 October 2009). "UK and France lead with hybrid IPTV set-tops". Broadbandtvnews.com. Archived from the original on 28 July 2013. Retrieved 15 June 2013.cite web: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  60. ^ [1] Archived 2 April 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  61. ^ "HYBRID Set Top Boxes for IPTV | Digital Media Strategy by Jeff Vinson". Jviptv.wordpress.com. 25 June 2009. Archived from the original on 19 July 2013. Retrieved 15 June 2013.
  62. ^ [2] Archived 5 April 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  63. ^ "New European initiative merges television with the power of the Internet" (PDF) (Press release). HbbTV Consortium. 27 August 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 October 2009.
  64. ^ "ADB Delivers World's First Hybrid, Single-Chip, Advanced Video Coding, High Definition IPTV Set-Top Boxes To TELEFÓNICA". Digitaltvnews.net. Archived from the original on 27 February 2012. Retrieved 15 June 2013.
  65. ^ "IPTV Americas Launches First IPTV Satellite Distribution Platform for Latin America and The Caribbean via SES NEW SKIES' NSS-806" (Press release). IPTV Americas. 13 January 2009. Archived from the original on 16 October 2011.
  66. ^ "Broadband Users Control What They Watch and When". Archived from the original on 20 April 2010.
  67. ^ Riede, Christian; Al-Hezmi, Adel; Magedanz, Thomas (12 February 2008). "Session and Media Signalling for IPTV via IMS" (PDF). MobileWare'08. Innsbruck, Austria. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 June 2008.
  68. ^ Bulkley, Kate. "IPTV's Eastern Promise" Digital TV Europe October 2008 p 48
  69. ^ Brown, Peter J. "Super Headends And High Expectations" Via Satellite April 2006 p 18–30
  70. ^ Denis, Lacković (9 March 2020). "Network Requirements for IPTV and OTT Service". Uniqcast. Archived from the original on 8 December 2022. Retrieved 30 April 2023.
  71. ^ IPTV privacy risks Archived 5 January 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  72. ^ "Ericsson report on need for regulation" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 November 2008. (217 KB)
  73. ^ (CRTC), Government of Canada, Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (3 September 2008). "TV or Not TV: Three Screens, One Regulation?". www.crtc.gc.ca. Archived from the original on 13 December 2017. Retrieved 25 April 2018.cite web: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

Further reading

[edit]
  • Anderson, Nate (12 March 2006). "An Introduction to IPTV". Ars Technica.