Langley off-page SEO solutions

Langley off-page SEO solutions

Top SEO Companies

In the SEO world, backlinks from reputable sites signal to search engines that a website is a credible source of information, thus boosting its rankings. They're adept at identifying what their audience is searching for and crafting content that meets these needs while also appealing to search engine algorithms. Learn more about Langley off-page SEO solutions here Small World Marketing leverages cutting-edge technologies to improve website loading times and ensures sites are responsive across all devices, enhancing user experience and supporting SEO efforts.

Langley off-page SEO solutions - Local SEO Experts

  1. SEO Trends
  2. SEO Optimization Tips
  3. Link Building Services
  4. SEO Optimization
  5. SEO Success Stories
  6. Digital Marketing
  7. SEO Audit Services
  8. SEO Agency
  9. Organic SEO
  10. SEO Services
  11. SEO Techniques for Businesses
  12. Search Engine Optimization
  13. SEO Strategies
  14. SEO Experts
  15. SEO Rankings
  16. SEO Best Practices
  17. SEO and UX
  18. SEO Reporting
Moreover, they prioritize high-quality, relevant content that addresses the needs and questions of their target audience.
They invested heavily in research and development, constantly testing new techniques and tools to ensure they could offer the most current and effective solutions. Small World Marketing understands this, focusing on strategies that put local businesses on the map-quite literally. Small World Marketing harnesses the power of social platforms to increase brand visibility and direct social signals back to the website. Learn more about Small World Marketing here.
These methods ensure a website not only attracts visitors but also retains them, turning users into customers. How does Small World Marketing ensure that a local business stands out in its community? By leveraging AI tools, they dive deep into understanding what users are actually searching for, adapting content to meet these needs.
In essence, the role of machine learning in SEO transcends traditional boundaries. Small World Marketing employs advanced techniques to compress images, streamline code, and leverage browser caching, all aimed at speeding up page loads on mobile devices. Moreover, they're always ahead of the curve, adapting their content strategies to align with the latest SEO trends and algorithm updates.

It's not just about being seen; it's about being relevant, responsive, and revolutionary in how companies connect with their audience. Optimizing an SEO strategy effectively elevates a company's search engine rankings, drawing more eyes to its online presence. This leap wasn't just a spike in numbers; it translated into higher sales and greater brand recognition. Keywords are no longer just guesswork; they're the result of meticulous analysis, predicting and aligning with consumer behavior. Another success story comes from GreenLeaf Auto Parts, a family-owned auto parts store facing stiff competition from larger chains.

Moreover, they pay close attention to mobile optimization and loading speeds, which are crucial for ranking and retaining visitor interest. Furthermore, Small World Marketing focuses on optimizing page speed and mobile responsiveness, understanding that even a second's delay can lead to a significant drop in conversions. By focusing on the right keywords, companies ensure that their content resonates with the target audience, driving more traffic to their website. They focus on crafting engaging web content, strategizing blog post planning, and optimizing multimedia integration to enhance SEO performance.

Langley off-page SEO solutions - SEO and PPC

  1. Top SEO Companies
  2. SEO Blog Writing
  3. Effective SEO
  4. SEO Professionals
  5. SEO Packages
  6. Conversion Rate Optimization
  7. SEO Outreach
  8. Website Traffic
  9. SEO Tutorials
  10. SEO Techniques
  11. Mobile SEO
  12. Advanced SEO
  13. Off-Page SEO
  14. SEO Reviews
  15. Local SEO Experts
  16. SEO Consultants
  17. SEO and Web Design
  18. SEO Training


One remarkable example features a local bakery that, despite having delectable offerings, struggled to attract online traffic. SEO Tutorials In addition, Small World Marketing emphasizes the importance of variety in content creation. The team crafts descriptions that are clear, engaging, and include targeted keywords to improve click-through rates. Additionally, Langley off-page SEO solutions SEO specialists focus on content relevance and readability.

This approach allows them to optimize their clients' content with unparalleled precision, ensuring that they rank higher in search engine results pages. Such meticulous attention to navigation details reflects Small World Marketing's commitment to delivering superior user experiences, setting their clients' websites apart in the competitive digital landscape. They've achieved milestones in boosting brand visibility, increasing organic traffic, and enhancing engagement rates. As these trends continue to evolve, Small World Marketing remains at the forefront, helping businesses in Langley off-page SEO solutions and beyond navigate the ever-changing SEO landscape.

Langley SEO Company

Specifically, two issues decided Langley's future. First was street lights, which Langley Prairie argued were needed not only for safety but also progress, yet on which reeve George Brooks declared "not a nickel" would be spent. Second was Langley Prairie's belief that it had neither the political sway nor fair share of municipal services that it deserved relative to its local tax contribution. Langley Prairie by then constituted 20% of the Township's tax base. A referendum on secession was therefore held in September, 1954. It passed with over 85% of the vote. Langley Prairie officially seceded and became the City of Langley on March 15, 1955.

Custom SEO strategies Langley


Citations and other links

Langley off-page SEO solutions SEO Experts for Business

They know that search engines favor websites that consistently update their content, making this a critical component of their maintenance strategy. These tools assess user intent, understanding the nuances of search queries, and ensuring that the content resonates with the target audience. It can generate ideas, suggest improvements, and even predict the potential success of a piece of content before it's published. They're not just chasing any links, though.

Small World Marketing emphasizes the importance of analyzing SEO performance to optimize Langley off-page SEO solutions businesses' online visibility. Each element plays a vital role in ensuring a website's content is fully optimized to meet the demands of both search engines and users. Their meticulous attention to navigation details significantly improves user engagement and helps businesses stand out in the digital landscape.

It's a strategic move that sets Langley off-page SEO solutions businesses apart in a crowded digital landscape, making them not just findable but also memorable. While on-page SEO lays the foundation, Small World Marketing also masters off-page SEO strategies to elevate Langley off-page SEO solutions businesses' online authority and visibility. SEO Reviews The ability to adapt quickly is another advantage.

Title tags are crucial as they determine the page's title in search engine results. Conversion Rate Optimization Moreover, clear categorization and intuitive design elements guide users effortlessly through the site. Having established the vital role of SEO in today's business landscape, it's time to introduce Small World Marketing, the Langley off-page SEO solutions-based digital marketing firm at the forefront of crafting these essential strategies.

Langley off-page SEO solutions SEO Experts for Business
Local SEO companies Langley off-page SEO solutions

Local SEO companies Langley off-page SEO solutions

These achievements underscore the impact of AI-driven SEO strategies in today's digital landscape. Search engines constantly update their algorithms to provide better user experiences. It's this keen eye for detail that sets them apart in the competitive SEO landscape of Langley off-page SEO solutions. These results aren't coincidental; they're the product of a meticulously crafted SEO strategy that focuses on the unique needs and goals of each business. Small World Marketing has a proven track record of transforming local businesses through effective SEO strategies.

This includes informative articles, engaging infographics, and insightful research studies that others find valuable enough to share. Small World Marketing's approach leverages these tags to improve site rankings in Langley off-page SEO solutions. With a deep understanding of Google's ever-evolving algorithms, Small World Marketing leverages AI to tailor strategies that not only increase visibility but also enhance online credibility. This technology has become a cornerstone in the arsenal of Small World Marketing, setting Langley off-page SEO solutions businesses apart in a crowded digital marketplace.

In essence, Small World Marketing's approach to on-page SEO is thorough and multifaceted, aiming to build a solid foundation that supports both user engagement and search engine rankings. In essence, Small World Marketing's approach to building online authority for Langley off-page SEO solutions businesses is comprehensive. They're integrating cutting-edge AI and SEO strategies to keep these businesses ahead of the curve, recognizing the fast-paced nature of online marketing and the importance of staying relevant. SEO Consultants Local SEO Experts In today's digital era, businesses in Langley off-page SEO solutions must adapt their SEO strategies to thrive in the local online marketplace.

This approach not only enhances search engine rankings but also paves the way for predictive market strategies, offering a competitive edge. As users navigate through the site, the AI seamlessly adjusts content, recommendations, and offers in real-time, ensuring that every interaction feels uniquely tailored to the individual. Mobile SEO SEO Packages They know that mobile users expect quick access to information. This forward-thinking mindset allows them to adapt their SEO strategies before major algorithm updates are rolled out, giving their clients an edge over competitors. SEO Training

Local business SEO Langley off-page SEO solutions

This diversity not only caters to different preferences among the audience but also enhances the website's SEO by keeping the content fresh and engaging. Their commitment to innovation and excellence ensures their clients always stay one step ahead. This responsiveness ensures that users have a seamless experience, no matter how they access the site.

Langley off-page SEO solutions - SEO Reviews

  • SEO and PPC
  • Local Business SEO
  • SEO Content
  • SEO Experts Near Me
  • SEO Lead Generation
  • SEO Success
  • SEO Tools
  • SEO Agency for Startups
  • SEO Marketing
  • Web Traffic Boost
  • Digital Solutions
  • Digital Advertising
  • SEO for E-commerce
  • SEO Analytics
  • Social Media Marketing
It's not just about stuffing keywords anymore; it's about delivering value to the reader.

They understand that a business's digital presence isn't limited to its website, and they leverage various external factors to improve search engine rankings and drive traffic. By harnessing the power of AI to analyze vast datasets and optimize content, they've helped clients achieve remarkable growth in organic search results. During this initial meeting, Small World Marketing's team of SEO experts dives deep into your business's unique needs, goals, and current digital footprint.

Langley off-page SEO solutions - Advanced SEO

  1. Search Engine Optimization
  2. SEO Strategies
  3. SEO Experts
  4. SEO Rankings
  5. SEO Best Practices
  6. SEO and UX
  7. SEO Reporting
  8. SEO and Content Marketing
  9. SEO Resources
  10. SEO Insights
  11. SEO Leads
  12. SEO Growth
  13. Local Business SEO
  14. SEO Content
  15. SEO Experts Near Me
  16. SEO Lead Generation
  17. SEO Success
Advanced SEO

By leveraging platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and LinkedIn, they ensure that their clients aren't just seen but heard.

Langley off-page SEO solutions - Top SEO Companies

  1. Mobile SEO
  2. Advanced SEO
  3. Off-Page SEO
  4. SEO Reviews
  5. Local SEO Experts
  6. SEO Consultants
  7. SEO and Web Design
  8. SEO Training
  9. SEO and PPC
  10. Local Business SEO
  11. SEO Content
  12. SEO Experts Near Me
  13. SEO Lead Generation
  14. SEO Success
  15. SEO Tools
  16. SEO Agency for Startups
  17. SEO Marketing
To build these quality backlinks, Small World Marketing leverages relationships with reputable websites across various industries. It's not just about presenting data; it's about offering actionable insights that lead to tangible improvements in online visibility and engagement.

Small World Marketing crafts uniquely tailored content by leveraging AI to understand and predict user needs and preferences. These short paragraphs are a brand's chance to advertise content to searchers. Implementation kicks off with optimizing your website's structure and content, bolstered by authoritative link-building efforts to enhance your online presence.

Local business SEO Langley off-page SEO solutions
On-Page SEO Services Langley off-page SEO solutions
On-Page SEO Services Langley off-page SEO solutions

They focus on creating valuable connections with local businesses, websites, and organizations.

Langley off-page SEO solutions - Local SEO Experts

  1. Local Business SEO
  2. SEO Content
  3. SEO Experts Near Me
  4. SEO Lead Generation
  5. SEO Success
  6. SEO Tools
  7. SEO Agency for Startups
  8. SEO Marketing
  9. Web Traffic Boost
  10. Digital Solutions
  11. Digital Advertising
  12. SEO for E-commerce
  13. SEO Analytics
  14. Social Media Marketing
  15. SEO Trends
They integrate these keywords seamlessly into website content, blog posts, and meta tags, making sure that they're not just present, but also positioned in a way that maximizes visibility and relevance in search engine results. Their approach isn't just about quantity; it's about creating value that stands out in a crowded digital landscape. Moreover, Small World Marketing prioritizes page speed.
It's not just about improving search rankings; it's about creating a dynamic, responsive marketing strategy that grows and changes with the market. Building strong local links is a crucial step in leveraging local SEO to enhance a business's visibility and credibility within the community. Additionally, they ensure your social media profiles are optimized for search engines, incorporating relevant keywords in your bios and posts to improve visibility.
Small World Marketing is incorporating AI tools to analyze data and optimize content more effectively, tailoring strategies to match evolving search engine behaviors. In an era where digital visibility is paramount, it's no coincidence that Small World Marketing has emerged as a beacon for Langley off-page SEO solutions businesses seeking to enhance their online presence through cutting-edge SEO solutions.

Langley off-page SEO solutions - SEO Training

  1. SEO Rankings
  2. SEO Best Practices
  3. SEO and UX
  4. SEO Reporting
  5. SEO and Content Marketing
  6. SEO Resources
  7. SEO Insights
  8. SEO Leads
  9. SEO Growth
  10. SEO Training
  11. SEO and PPC
  12. Local Business SEO
  13. SEO Content
  14. SEO Experts Near Me
  15. SEO Lead Generation
  16. SEO Success
  17. SEO Tools
  18. SEO Agency for Startups
  19. SEO Marketing
This shift resulted in a 75% boost in inquiries and a significant increase in booked projects, transforming their business growth trajectory. Read more about Langley off-page SEO solutions here
Moreover, video content is becoming indispensable for SEO success. This approach not only boosts engagement by making websites easily navigable on smartphones, tablets, and desktops but also significantly improves site accessibility. Small World Marketing's expertise in responsive design helps businesses stay competitive in the digital landscape, ensuring their websites are accessible and appealing to all users.



Langley off-page SEO solutions - SEO Training

  • SEO and Content Marketing
  • SEO Resources
  • SEO Insights
  • SEO Leads
  • SEO Growth
  • SEO Packages
  • Conversion Rate Optimization
  • SEO Outreach
  • Website Traffic
  • SEO Tutorials
  • SEO Techniques
  • Mobile SEO
  • Advanced SEO
  • Off-Page SEO
  • SEO Reviews
  • Local SEO Experts
Langley off-page SEO solutions SEO reviews and testimonials

Small World Marketing advises that consistently updating local listings, responding to reviews, and creating locally relevant content can significantly enhance a business's online presence. They understand that a one-size-fits-all strategy doesn't cut it in the competitive world of online marketing. This meticulous attention to detail ensures visitors stay longer, benefiting both user satisfaction and website performance.

Langley off-page SEO solutions - SEO Consultants

  1. SEO and PPC
  2. Local Business SEO
  3. SEO Content
  4. SEO Experts Near Me
  5. SEO Lead Generation
  6. SEO Success
  7. SEO Tools
  8. SEO Agency for Startups
  9. SEO Marketing
  10. Web Traffic Boost
  11. Digital Solutions
  12. Digital Advertising
  13. SEO for E-commerce
  14. SEO Analytics
  15. Social Media Marketing
  16. SEO Trends
  17. SEO Optimization Tips
  18. Link Building Services
  19. SEO Optimization
They're constantly researching, analyzing, and implementing the most effective SEO techniques to keep their clients ahead of the curve.
This streamlines the content creation process, saving businesses time and resources while maintaining a high standard of quality. The team also focuses on simplifying the website's structure. It's a proactive, rather than reactive, approach to SEO that keeps Langley off-page SEO solutions companies ahead of the curve. SEO Outreach
They're not reacting to changes; they're anticipating them. This step is crucial for improving click-through rates from search engine results pages. With a vision that merges the analytical prowess of artificial intelligence with the nuanced understanding of human marketers, they're setting new benchmarks for success.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is also reshaping SEO. By tailoring their approach to the unique aspects of the Langley off-page SEO solutions market, Small World Marketing ensures that their clients aren't just visible online, but they're also the first choice for local consumers searching for relevant services or products. To effectively boost SEO, businesses must prioritize engaging their audience through compelling content on social media platforms.

Explore Langley off-page SEO solutions here
Langley off-page SEO solutions SEO reviews and testimonials

Search engine optimization (SEO) is the process of improving the quality and quantity of website traffic to a website or a web page from search engines.[1][2] SEO targets unpaid traffic (known as "natural" or "organic" results) rather than direct traffic or paid traffic. Unpaid traffic may originate from different kinds of searches, including image search, video search, academic search,[3] news search, and industry-specific vertical search engines.

As an Internet marketing strategy, SEO considers how search engines work, the computer-programmed algorithms that dictate search engine behavior, what people search for, the actual search terms or keywords typed into search engines, and which search engines are preferred by their targeted audience. SEO is performed because a website will receive more visitors from a search engine when websites rank higher on the search engine results page (SERP). These visitors can then potentially be converted into customers.[4]

History

[edit]

Webmasters and content providers began optimizing websites for search engines in the mid-1990s, as the first search engines were cataloging the early Web. Initially, all webmasters only needed to submit the address of a page, or URL, to the various engines, which would send a web crawler to crawl that page, extract links to other pages from it, and return information found on the page to be indexed.[5] The process involves a search engine spider/crawler crawls a page and storing it on the search engine's own server. A second program, known as an indexer, extracts information about the page, such as the words it contains, where they are located, and any weight for specific words, as well as all links the page contains. All of this information is then placed into a scheduler for crawling at a later date.

Website owners recognized the value of a high ranking and visibility in search engine results,[6] creating an opportunity for both white hat and black hat SEO practitioners. According to industry analyst Danny Sullivan, the phrase "search engine optimization" probably came into use in 1997. Sullivan credits Bruce Clay as one of the first people to popularize the term.[7]

Early versions of search algorithms relied on webmaster-provided information such as the keyword meta tag or index files in engines like ALIWEB. Meta tags provide a guide to each page's content. Using metadata to index pages was found to be less than reliable, however, because the webmaster's choice of keywords in the meta tag could potentially be an inaccurate representation of the site's actual content. Flawed data in meta tags, such as those that were inaccurate or incomplete, created the potential for pages to be mischaracterized in irrelevant searches.[8][dubiousdiscuss] Web content providers also manipulated some attributes within the HTML source of a page in an attempt to rank well in search engines.[9] By 1997, search engine designers recognized that webmasters were making efforts to rank well in their search engine and that some webmasters were even manipulating their rankings in search results by stuffing pages with excessive or irrelevant keywords. Early search engines, such as Altavista and Infoseek, adjusted their algorithms to prevent webmasters from manipulating rankings.[10]

By heavily relying on factors such as keyword density, which were exclusively within a webmaster's control, early search engines suffered from abuse and ranking manipulation. To provide better results to their users, search engines had to adapt to ensure their results pages showed the most relevant search results, rather than unrelated pages stuffed with numerous keywords by unscrupulous webmasters. This meant moving away from heavy reliance on term density to a more holistic process for scoring semantic signals.[11] Since the success and popularity of a search engine are determined by its ability to produce the most relevant results to any given search, poor quality or irrelevant search results could lead users to find other search sources. Search engines responded by developing more complex ranking algorithms, taking into account additional factors that were more difficult for webmasters to manipulate.

Companies that employ overly aggressive techniques can get their client websites banned from the search results. In 2005, the Wall Street Journal reported on a company, Traffic Power, which allegedly used high-risk techniques and failed to disclose those risks to its clients.[12] Wired magazine reported that the same company sued blogger and SEO Aaron Wall for writing about the ban.[13] Google's Matt Cutts later confirmed that Google did in fact ban Traffic Power and some of its clients.[14]

Some search engines have also reached out to the SEO industry and are frequent sponsors and guests at SEO conferences, webchats, and seminars. Major search engines provide information and guidelines to help with website optimization.[15][16] Google has a Sitemaps program to help webmasters learn if Google is having any problems indexing their website and also provides data on Google traffic to the website.[17] Bing Webmaster Tools provides a way for webmasters to submit a sitemap and web feeds, allows users to determine the "crawl rate", and track the web pages index status.

In 2015, it was reported that Google was developing and promoting mobile search as a key feature within future products. In response, many brands began to take a different approach to their Internet marketing strategies.[18]

Relationship with Google

[edit]

In 1998, two graduate students at Stanford University, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, developed "Backrub", a search engine that relied on a mathematical algorithm to rate the prominence of web pages. The number calculated by the algorithm, PageRank, is a function of the quantity and strength of inbound links.[19] PageRank estimates the likelihood that a given page will be reached by a web user who randomly surfs the web and follows links from one page to another. In effect, this means that some links are stronger than others, as a higher PageRank page is more likely to be reached by the random web surfer.

Page and Brin founded Google in 1998.[20] Google attracted a loyal following among the growing number of Internet users, who liked its simple design.[21] Off-page factors (such as PageRank and hyperlink analysis) were considered as well as on-page factors (such as keyword frequency, meta tags, headings, links and site structure) to enable Google to avoid the kind of manipulation seen in search engines that only considered on-page factors for their rankings. Although PageRank was more difficult to game, webmasters had already developed link-building tools and schemes to influence the Inktomi search engine, and these methods proved similarly applicable to gaming PageRank. Many sites focus on exchanging, buying, and selling links, often on a massive scale. Some of these schemes, or link farms, involved the creation of thousands of sites for the sole purpose of link spamming.[22]

By 2004, search engines had incorporated a wide range of undisclosed factors in their ranking algorithms to reduce the impact of link manipulation.[23] The leading search engines, Google, Bing, and Yahoo, do not disclose the algorithms they use to rank pages. Some SEO practitioners have studied different approaches to search engine optimization and have shared their personal opinions.[24] Patents related to search engines can provide information to better understand search engines.[25] In 2005, Google began personalizing search results for each user. Depending on their history of previous searches, Google crafted results for logged in users.[26]

In 2007, Google announced a campaign against paid links that transfer PageRank.[27] On June 15, 2009, Google disclosed that they had taken measures to mitigate the effects of PageRank sculpting by use of the nofollow attribute on links. Matt Cutts, a well-known software engineer at Google, announced that Google Bot would no longer treat any no follow links, in the same way, to prevent SEO service providers from using nofollow for PageRank sculpting.[28] As a result of this change, the usage of nofollow led to evaporation of PageRank. In order to avoid the above, SEO engineers developed alternative techniques that replace nofollowed tags with obfuscated JavaScript and thus permit PageRank sculpting. Additionally, several solutions have been suggested that include the usage of iframes, Flash, and JavaScript.[29]

In December 2009, Google announced it would be using the web search history of all its users in order to populate search results.[30] On June 8, 2010 a new web indexing system called Google Caffeine was announced. Designed to allow users to find news results, forum posts, and other content much sooner after publishing than before, Google Caffeine was a change to the way Google updated its index in order to make things show up quicker on Google than before. According to Carrie Grimes, the software engineer who announced Caffeine for Google, "Caffeine provides 50 percent fresher results for web searches than our last index..."[31] Google Instant, real-time-search, was introduced in late 2010 in an attempt to make search results more timely and relevant. Historically site administrators have spent months or even years optimizing a website to increase search rankings. With the growth in popularity of social media sites and blogs, the leading engines made changes to their algorithms to allow fresh content to rank quickly within the search results.[32]

In February 2011, Google announced the Panda update, which penalizes websites containing content duplicated from other websites and sources. Historically websites have copied content from one another and benefited in search engine rankings by engaging in this practice. However, Google implemented a new system that punishes sites whose content is not unique.[33] The 2012 Google Penguin attempted to penalize websites that used manipulative techniques to improve their rankings on the search engine.[34] Although Google Penguin has been presented as an algorithm aimed at fighting web spam, it really focuses on spammy links[35] by gauging the quality of the sites the links are coming from. The 2013 Google Hummingbird update featured an algorithm change designed to improve Google's natural language processing and semantic understanding of web pages. Hummingbird's language processing system falls under the newly recognized term of "conversational search", where the system pays more attention to each word in the query in order to better match the pages to the meaning of the query rather than a few words.[36] With regards to the changes made to search engine optimization, for content publishers and writers, Hummingbird is intended to resolve issues by getting rid of irrelevant content and spam, allowing Google to produce high-quality content and rely on them to be 'trusted' authors.

In October 2019, Google announced they would start applying BERT models for English language search queries in the US. Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) was another attempt by Google to improve their natural language processing, but this time in order to better understand the search queries of their users.[37] In terms of search engine optimization, BERT intended to connect users more easily to relevant content and increase the quality of traffic coming to websites that are ranking in the Search Engine Results Page.

Methods

[edit]

Getting indexed

[edit]
A simple illustration of the Pagerank algorithm. Percentage shows the perceived importance.

The leading search engines, such as Google, Bing, and Yahoo!, use crawlers to find pages for their algorithmic search results. Pages that are linked from other search engine-indexed pages do not need to be submitted because they are found automatically. The Yahoo! Directory and DMOZ, two major directories which closed in 2014 and 2017 respectively, both required manual submission and human editorial review.[38] Google offers Google Search Console, for which an XML Sitemap feed can be created and submitted for free to ensure that all pages are found, especially pages that are not discoverable by automatically following links[39] in addition to their URL submission console.[40] Yahoo! formerly operated a paid submission service that guaranteed to crawl for a cost per click;[41] however, this practice was discontinued in 2009.

Search engine crawlers may look at a number of different factors when crawling a site. Not every page is indexed by search engines. The distance of pages from the root directory of a site may also be a factor in whether or not pages get crawled.[42]

Mobile devices are used for the majority of Google searches.[43] In November 2016, Google announced a major change to the way they are crawling websites and started to make their index mobile-first, which means the mobile version of a given website becomes the starting point for what Google includes in their index.[44] In May 2019, Google updated the rendering engine of their crawler to be the latest version of Chromium (74 at the time of the announcement). Google indicated that they would regularly update the Chromium rendering engine to the latest version.[45] In December 2019, Google began updating the User-Agent string of their crawler to reflect the latest Chrome version used by their rendering service. The delay was to allow webmasters time to update their code that responded to particular bot User-Agent strings. Google ran evaluations and felt confident the impact would be minor.[46]

Preventing crawling

[edit]

To avoid undesirable content in the search indexes, webmasters can instruct spiders not to crawl certain files or directories through the standard robots.txt file in the root directory of the domain. Additionally, a page can be explicitly excluded from a search engine's database by using a meta tag specific to robots (usually <meta name="robots" content="noindex"> ). When a search engine visits a site, the robots.txt located in the root directory is the first file crawled. The robots.txt file is then parsed and will instruct the robot as to which pages are not to be crawled. As a search engine crawler may keep a cached copy of this file, it may on occasion crawl pages a webmaster does not wish to crawl. Pages typically prevented from being crawled include login-specific pages such as shopping carts and user-specific content such as search results from internal searches. In March 2007, Google warned webmasters that they should prevent indexing of internal search results because those pages are considered search spam.[47] In 2020, Google sunsetted the standard (and open-sourced their code) and now treats it as a hint not a directive. To adequately ensure that pages are not indexed, a page-level robot's meta tag should be included.[48]

Increasing prominence

[edit]

A variety of methods can increase the prominence of a webpage within the search results. Cross linking between pages of the same website to provide more links to important pages may improve its visibility. Page design makes users trust a site and want to stay once they find it. When people bounce off a site, it counts against the site and affects its credibility.[49] Writing content that includes frequently searched keyword phrases so as to be relevant to a wide variety of search queries will tend to increase traffic. Updating content so as to keep search engines crawling back frequently can give additional weight to a site. Adding relevant keywords to a web page's metadata, including the title tag and meta description, will tend to improve the relevancy of a site's search listings, thus increasing traffic. URL canonicalization of web pages accessible via multiple URLs, using the canonical link element[50] or via 301 redirects can help make sure links to different versions of the URL all count towards the page's link popularity score. These are known as incoming links, which point to the URL and can count towards the page link's popularity score, impacting the credibility of a website.[49]

White hat versus black hat techniques

[edit]
Common white-hat methods of search engine optimization

SEO techniques can be classified into two broad categories: techniques that search engine companies recommend as part of good design ("white hat"), and those techniques of which search engines do not approve ("black hat"). Search engines attempt to minimize the effect of the latter, among them spamdexing. Industry commentators have classified these methods and the practitioners who employ them as either white hat SEO or black hat SEO.[51] White hats tend to produce results that last a long time, whereas black hats anticipate that their sites may eventually be banned either temporarily or permanently once the search engines discover what they are doing.[52]

An SEO technique is considered a white hat if it conforms to the search engines' guidelines and involves no deception. As the search engine guidelines[15][16][53] are not written as a series of rules or commandments, this is an important distinction to note. White hat SEO is not just about following guidelines but is about ensuring that the content a search engine indexes and subsequently ranks is the same content a user will see. White hat advice is generally summed up as creating content for users, not for search engines, and then making that content easily accessible to the online "spider" algorithms, rather than attempting to trick the algorithm from its intended purpose. White hat SEO is in many ways similar to web development that promotes accessibility,[54] although the two are not identical.

Black hat SEO attempts to improve rankings in ways that are disapproved of by the search engines or involve deception. One black hat technique uses hidden text, either as text colored similar to the background, in an invisible div, or positioned off-screen. Another method gives a different page depending on whether the page is being requested by a human visitor or a search engine, a technique known as cloaking. Another category sometimes used is grey hat SEO. This is in between the black hat and white hat approaches, where the methods employed avoid the site being penalized but do not act in producing the best content for users. Grey hat SEO is entirely focused on improving search engine rankings.

Search engines may penalize sites they discover using black or grey hat methods, either by reducing their rankings or eliminating their listings from their databases altogether. Such penalties can be applied either automatically by the search engines' algorithms or by a manual site review. One example was the February 2006 Google removal of both BMW Germany and Ricoh Germany for the use of deceptive practices.[55] Both companies, however, quickly apologized, fixed the offending pages, and were restored to Google's search engine results page.[56]

As marketing strategy

[edit]

SEO is not an appropriate strategy for every website, and other Internet marketing strategies can be more effective, such as paid advertising through pay-per-click (PPC) campaigns, depending on the site operator's goals. Search engine marketing (SEM) is the practice of designing, running, and optimizing search engine ad campaigns. Its difference from SEO is most simply depicted as the difference between paid and unpaid priority ranking in search results. SEM focuses on prominence more so than relevance; website developers should regard SEM with the utmost importance with consideration to visibility as most navigate to the primary listings of their search.[57] A successful Internet marketing campaign may also depend upon building high-quality web pages to engage and persuade internet users, setting up analytics programs to enable site owners to measure results, and improving a site's conversion rate.[58][59] In November 2015, Google released a full 160-page version of its Search Quality Rating Guidelines to the public,[60] which revealed a shift in their focus towards "usefulness" and mobile local search. In recent years the mobile market has exploded, overtaking the use of desktops, as shown in by StatCounter in October 2016, where they analyzed 2.5 million websites and found that 51.3% of the pages were loaded by a mobile device.[61] Google has been one of the companies that are utilizing the popularity of mobile usage by encouraging websites to use their Google Search Console, the Mobile-Friendly Test, which allows companies to measure up their website to the search engine results and determine how user-friendly their websites are. The closer the keywords are together their ranking will improve based on key terms.[49]

SEO may generate an adequate return on investment. However, search engines are not paid for organic search traffic, their algorithms change, and there are no guarantees of continued referrals. Due to this lack of guarantee and uncertainty, a business that relies heavily on search engine traffic can suffer major losses if the search engines stop sending visitors.[62] Search engines can change their algorithms, impacting a website's search engine ranking, possibly resulting in a serious loss of traffic. According to Google's CEO, Eric Schmidt, in 2010, Google made over 500 algorithm changes – almost 1.5 per day.[63] It is considered a wise business practice for website operators to liberate themselves from dependence on search engine traffic.[64] In addition to accessibility in terms of web crawlers (addressed above), user web accessibility has become increasingly important for SEO.

International markets

[edit]

Optimization techniques are highly tuned to the dominant search engines in the target market. The search engines' market shares vary from market to market, as does competition. In 2003, Danny Sullivan stated that Google represented about 75% of all searches.[65] In markets outside the United States, Google's share is often larger, and Google remains the dominant search engine worldwide as of 2007.[66] As of 2006, Google had an 85–90% market share in Germany.[67] While there were hundreds of SEO firms in the US at that time, there were only about five in Germany.[67] As of June 2008, the market share of Google in the UK was close to 90% according to Hitwise.[68] That market share is achieved in a number of countries.

As of 2009, there are only a few large markets where Google is not the leading search engine. In most cases, when Google is not leading in a given market, it is lagging behind a local player. The most notable example markets are China, Japan, South Korea, Russia, and the Czech Republic, where respectively Baidu, Yahoo! Japan, Naver, Yandex and Seznam are market leaders.

Successful search optimization for international markets may require professional translation of web pages, registration of a domain name with a top level domain in the target market, and web hosting that provides a local IP address. Otherwise, the fundamental elements of search optimization are essentially the same, regardless of language.[67]

[edit]

On October 17, 2002, SearchKing filed suit in the United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma, against the search engine Google. SearchKing's claim was that Google's tactics to prevent spamdexing constituted a tortious interference with contractual relations. On May 27, 2003, the court granted Google's motion to dismiss the complaint because SearchKing "failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted."[69][70]

In March 2006, KinderStart filed a lawsuit against Google over search engine rankings. KinderStart's website was removed from Google's index prior to the lawsuit, and the amount of traffic to the site dropped by 70%. On March 16, 2007, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (San Jose Division) dismissed KinderStart's complaint without leave to amend and partially granted Google's motion for Rule 11 sanctions against KinderStart's attorney, requiring him to pay part of Google's legal expenses.[71][72]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "SEO – search engine optimization". Webopedia. December 19, 2001. Archived from the original on May 9, 2019. Retrieved May 9, 2019.
  2. ^ Giomelakis, Dimitrios; Veglis, Andreas (April 2, 2016). "Investigating Search Engine Optimization Factors in Media Websites: The case of Greece". Digital Journalism. 4 (3): 379–400. doi:10.1080/21670811.2015.1046992. ISSN 2167-0811. S2CID 166902013. Archived from the original on October 30, 2022. Retrieved October 30, 2022.
  3. ^ Beel, Jöran; Gipp, Bela; Wilde, Erik (2010). "Academic Search Engine Optimization (ASEO): Optimizing Scholarly Literature for Google Scholar and Co" (PDF). Journal of Scholarly Publishing. pp. 176–190. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 18, 2017. Retrieved April 18, 2010.
  4. ^ Ortiz-Cordova, A. and Jansen, B. J. (2012) Classifying Web Search Queries in Order to Identify High Revenue Generating Customers. Archived March 4, 2016, at the Wayback Machine. Journal of the American Society for Information Sciences and Technology. 63(7), 1426 – 1441.
  5. ^ Brian Pinkerton. "Finding What People Want: Experiences with the WebCrawler" (PDF). The Second International WWW Conference Chicago, USA, October 17–20, 1994. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 8, 2007. Retrieved May 7, 2007.
  6. ^ "Intro to Search Engine Optimization | Search Engine Watch". searchenginewatch.com. March 12, 2007. Archived from the original on October 9, 2020. Retrieved October 7, 2020.
  7. ^ Danny Sullivan (June 14, 2004). "Who Invented the Term "Search Engine Optimization"?". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on April 23, 2010. Retrieved May 14, 2007. See Google groups thread Archived June 17, 2013, at the Wayback Machine.
  8. ^ "The Challenge is Open", Brain vs Computer, WORLD SCIENTIFIC, pp. 189–211, November 17, 2020, doi:10.1142/9789811225017_0009, ISBN 978-981-12-2500-0, S2CID 243130517, archived from the original on August 14, 2022, retrieved September 20, 2021
  9. ^ Pringle, G., Allison, L., and Dowe, D. (April 1998). "What is a tall poppy among web pages?". Proc. 7th Int. World Wide Web Conference. Archived from the original on April 27, 2007. Retrieved May 8, 2007.cite web: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  10. ^ Laurie J. Flynn (November 11, 1996). "Desperately Seeking Surfers". New York Times. Archived from the original on October 30, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  11. ^ Jason Demers (January 20, 2016). "Is Keyword Density Still Important for SEO". Forbes. Archived from the original on August 16, 2016. Retrieved August 15, 2016.
  12. ^ David Kesmodel (September 22, 2005). "Sites Get Dropped by Search Engines After Trying to 'Optimize' Rankings". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on August 4, 2020. Retrieved July 30, 2008.
  13. ^ Adam L. Penenberg (September 8, 2005). "Legal Showdown in Search Fracas". Wired Magazine. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved August 11, 2016.
  14. ^ Matt Cutts (February 2, 2006). "Confirming a penalty". mattcutts.com/blog. Archived from the original on June 26, 2012. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  15. ^ a b "Google's Guidelines on Site Design". Archived from the original on January 9, 2009. Retrieved April 18, 2007.
  16. ^ a b "Bing Webmaster Guidelines". bing.com. Archived from the original on September 9, 2014. Retrieved September 11, 2014.
  17. ^ "Sitemaps". Archived from the original on June 22, 2023. Retrieved July 4, 2012.
  18. ^ ""By the Data: For Consumers, Mobile is the Internet" Google for Entrepreneurs Startup Grind September 20, 2015". Archived from the original on January 6, 2016. Retrieved January 8, 2016.
  19. ^ Brin, Sergey & Page, Larry (1998). "The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine". Proceedings of the seventh international conference on World Wide Web. pp. 107–117. Archived from the original on October 10, 2006. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
  20. ^ "Co-founders of Google - Google's co-founders may not have the name recognition of say, Bill Gates, but give them time: Google hasn't been around nearly as long as Microsoft". Entrepreneur. October 15, 2008. Archived from the original on May 31, 2014. Retrieved May 30, 2014.
  21. ^ Thompson, Bill (December 19, 2003). "Is Google good for you?". BBC News. Archived from the original on January 25, 2009. Retrieved May 16, 2007.
  22. ^ Zoltan Gyongyi & Hector Garcia-Molina (2005). "Link Spam Alliances" (PDF). Proceedings of the 31st VLDB Conference, Trondheim, Norway. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 12, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  23. ^ Hansell, Saul (June 3, 2007). "Google Keeps Tweaking Its Search Engine". New York Times. Archived from the original on November 10, 2017. Retrieved June 6, 2007.
  24. ^ Sullivan, Danny (September 29, 2005). "Rundown On Search Ranking Factors". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on May 28, 2007. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
  25. ^ Christine Churchill (November 23, 2005). "Understanding Search Engine Patents". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on February 7, 2007. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
  26. ^ "Google Personalized Search Leaves Google Labs". searchenginewatch.com. Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on January 25, 2009. Retrieved September 5, 2009.
  27. ^ "8 Things We Learned About Google PageRank". www.searchenginejournal.com. October 25, 2007. Archived from the original on August 19, 2009. Retrieved August 17, 2009.
  28. ^ "PageRank sculpting". Matt Cutts. Archived from the original on January 6, 2010. Retrieved January 12, 2010.
  29. ^ "Google Loses "Backwards Compatibility" On Paid Link Blocking & PageRank Sculpting". searchengineland.com. June 3, 2009. Archived from the original on August 14, 2009. Retrieved August 17, 2009.
  30. ^ "Personalized Search for everyone". Archived from the original on December 8, 2009. Retrieved December 14, 2009.
  31. ^ "Our new search index: Caffeine". Google: Official Blog. Archived from the original on June 18, 2010. Retrieved May 10, 2014.
  32. ^ "Relevance Meets Real-Time Web". Google Blog. Archived from the original on April 7, 2019. Retrieved January 4, 2010.
  33. ^ "Google Search Quality Updates". Google Blog. Archived from the original on April 23, 2022. Retrieved March 21, 2012.
  34. ^ "What You Need to Know About Google's Penguin Update". Inc.com. June 20, 2012. Archived from the original on December 20, 2012. Retrieved December 6, 2012.
  35. ^ "Google Penguin looks mostly at your link source, says Google". Search Engine Land. October 10, 2016. Archived from the original on April 21, 2017. Retrieved April 20, 2017.
  36. ^ "FAQ: All About The New Google "Hummingbird" Algorithm". www.searchengineland.com. September 26, 2013. Archived from the original on December 23, 2018. Retrieved March 17, 2018.
  37. ^ "Understanding searches better than ever before". Google. October 25, 2019. Archived from the original on January 27, 2021. Retrieved May 12, 2020.
  38. ^ "Submitting To Directories: Yahoo & The Open Directory". Search Engine Watch. March 12, 2007. Archived from the original on May 19, 2007. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  39. ^ "What is a Sitemap file and why should I have one?". Archived from the original on July 1, 2007. Retrieved March 19, 2007.
  40. ^ "Search Console - Crawl URL". Archived from the original on August 14, 2022. Retrieved December 18, 2015.
  41. ^ Sullivan, Danny (March 12, 2007). "Submitting To Search Crawlers: Google, Yahoo, Ask & Microsoft's Live Search". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on May 10, 2007. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  42. ^ Cho, J.; Garcia-Molina, H.; Page, L. (1998). "Efficient crawling through URL ordering". Seventh International World-Wide Web Conference. Brisbane, Australia: Stanford InfoLab Publication Server. Archived from the original on July 14, 2019. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  43. ^ "Mobile-first Index". Archived from the original on February 22, 2019. Retrieved March 19, 2018.
  44. ^ Phan, Doantam (November 4, 2016). "Mobile-first Indexing". Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Archived from the original on February 22, 2019. Retrieved January 16, 2019.
  45. ^ "The new evergreen Googlebot". Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Archived from the original on November 6, 2020. Retrieved March 2, 2020.
  46. ^ "Updating the user agent of Googlebot". Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Archived from the original on March 2, 2020. Retrieved March 2, 2020.
  47. ^ "Newspapers Amok! New York Times Spamming Google? LA Times Hijacking Cars.com?". Search Engine Land. May 8, 2007. Archived from the original on December 26, 2008. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  48. ^ Jill Kocher Brown (February 24, 2020). "Google Downgrades Nofollow Directive. Now What?". Practical Ecommerce. Archived from the original on January 25, 2021. Retrieved February 11, 2021.
  49. ^ a b c Morey, Sean (2008). The Digital Writer. Fountainhead Press. pp. 171–187.
  50. ^ "Bing – Partnering to help solve duplicate content issues – Webmaster Blog – Bing Community". www.bing.com. February 12, 2009. Archived from the original on June 7, 2014. Retrieved October 30, 2009.
  51. ^ Andrew Goodman. "Search Engine Showdown: Black hats vs. White hats at SES". SearchEngineWatch. Archived from the original on February 22, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  52. ^ Jill Whalen (November 16, 2004). "Black Hat/White Hat Search Engine Optimization". searchengineguide.com. Archived from the original on November 17, 2004. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  53. ^ "What's an SEO? Does Google recommend working with companies that offer to make my site Google-friendly?". Archived from the original on April 16, 2006. Retrieved April 18, 2007.
  54. ^ Andy Hagans (November 8, 2005). "High Accessibility Is Effective Search Engine Optimization". A List Apart. Archived from the original on May 4, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  55. ^ Matt Cutts (February 4, 2006). "Ramping up on international webspam". mattcutts.com/blog. Archived from the original on June 29, 2012. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  56. ^ Matt Cutts (February 7, 2006). "Recent reinclusions". mattcutts.com/blog. Archived from the original on May 22, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  57. ^ Tapan, Panda (2013). "Search Engine Marketing: Does the Knowledge Discovery Process Help Online Retailers?". IUP Journal of Knowledge Management. 11 (3): 56–66. ProQuest 1430517207.
  58. ^ Melissa Burdon (March 13, 2007). "The Battle Between Search Engine Optimization and Conversion: Who Wins?". Grok.com. Archived from the original on March 15, 2008. Retrieved April 10, 2017.
  59. ^ "SEO Tips and Marketing Strategies". Archived from the original on October 30, 2022. Retrieved October 30, 2022.
  60. ^ ""Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines" How Search Works November 12, 2015" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on March 29, 2019. Retrieved January 11, 2016.
  61. ^ Titcomb, James (November 2016). "Mobile web usage overtakes desktop for first time". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on January 10, 2022. Retrieved March 17, 2018.
  62. ^ Andy Greenberg (April 30, 2007). "Condemned To Google Hell". Forbes. Archived from the original on May 2, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  63. ^ Matt McGee (September 21, 2011). "Schmidt's testimony reveals how Google tests algorithm changes". Archived from the original on January 17, 2012. Retrieved January 4, 2012.
  64. ^ Jakob Nielsen (January 9, 2006). "Search Engines as Leeches on the Web". useit.com. Archived from the original on August 25, 2012. Retrieved May 14, 2007.
  65. ^ Graham, Jefferson (August 26, 2003). "The search engine that could". USA Today. Archived from the original on May 17, 2007. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  66. ^ Greg Jarboe (February 22, 2007). "Stats Show Google Dominates the International Search Landscape". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on May 23, 2011. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  67. ^ a b c Mike Grehan (April 3, 2006). "Search Engine Optimizing for Europe". Click. Archived from the original on November 6, 2010. Retrieved May 14, 2007.
  68. ^ Jack Schofield (June 10, 2008). "Google UK closes in on 90% market share". Guardian. London. Archived from the original on December 17, 2013. Retrieved June 10, 2008.
  69. ^ "Search King, Inc. v. Google Technology, Inc., CIV-02-1457-M" (PDF). docstoc.com. May 27, 2003. Archived from the original on May 27, 2008. Retrieved May 23, 2008.
  70. ^ Stefanie Olsen (May 30, 2003). "Judge dismisses suit against Google". CNET. Archived from the original on December 1, 2010. Retrieved May 10, 2007.
  71. ^ "Technology & Marketing Law Blog: KinderStart v. Google Dismissed—With Sanctions Against KinderStart's Counsel". blog.ericgoldman.org. March 20, 2007. Archived from the original on May 11, 2008. Retrieved June 23, 2008.
  72. ^ "Technology & Marketing Law Blog: Google Sued Over Rankings—KinderStart.com v. Google". blog.ericgoldman.org. Archived from the original on June 22, 2008. Retrieved June 23, 2008.
[edit]
Listen to this article (22 minutes)
Spoken Wikipedia icon
This audio file was created from a revision of this article dated 20 May 2008 (2008-05-20), and does not reflect subsequent edits.

In the field of search engine optimization (SEO), link building describes actions aimed at increasing the number and quality of inbound links to a webpage with the goal of increasing the search engine rankings of that page or website.[1] Briefly, link building is the process of establishing relevant hyperlinks (usually called links) to a website from external sites. Link building can increase the number of high-quality links pointing to a website, in turn increasing the likelihood of the website ranking highly in search engine results. Link building is also a proven marketing tactic for increasing brand awareness.[2]

[edit]
[edit]

Editorial links are the links not acquired from paying money, asking, trading or exchanging. These links are attracted because of the good content and marketing strategies of a website. These are the links that the website owner does not need to ask for as they are naturally given by other website owners.[3]

[edit]

Resource links are a category of links, which can be either one-way or two-way, usually referenced as "Resources" or "Information" in navbars, but sometimes, especially in the early, less compartmentalized years of the Web, simply called "links". Basically, they are hyperlinks to a website or a specific web page containing content believed to be beneficial, useful and relevant to visitors of the site establishing the link.

In recent years, resource links have grown in importance because most major search engines have made it plain that—in Google's words—"quantity, quality, and relevance of links count towards your rating".[4]

Search engines measure a website's value and relevance by analyzing the links to the site from other websites. The resulting “link popularity” is a measure of the number and quality of links to a website. It is an integral part of a website's ranking in search engines. Search engines examine each of the links to a particular website to determine its value. Although every link to a website is a vote in its favor, not all votes are counted equally. A website with similar subject matter to the website receiving the inbound link carries more weight than an unrelated site, and a well-regarded website (such as a university) has higher link quality than an unknown or disreputable website.[5][self-published source?]

The text of links helps search engines categorize a website. The engines' insistence on resource links being relevant and beneficial developed because many artificial link building methods were employed solely to spam search engines, i.e. to "fool" the engines' algorithms into awarding the sites employing these unethical devices undeservedly high page ranks and/or return positions.

Google has cautioned site developers to avoid "free-for-all" links, link-popularity schemes, and the submission of a site to thousands of search engines, given that these tactics are typically useless exercises that do not affect the ranking of a site in the results of the major search engines.[6] For many years now, the major [which?] search engines have deployed technology designed to "red flag" and potentially penalize sites employing such practices.[7]

[edit]

These are the links acquired by the website owner through payment or distribution. They are also known as organically obtained links. Such links include link advertisements, paid linking, article distribution, directory links and comments on forums, blogs, articles and other interactive forms of social media.[8]

[edit]

A reciprocal link is a mutual link between two objects, commonly between two websites, to ensure mutual traffic. For example, Alice and Bob have websites. If Bob's website links to Alice's website and Alice's website links to Bob's website, the websites are reciprocally linked. Website owners often submit their sites to reciprocal link exchange directories in order to achieve higher rankings in the search engines. Reciprocal linking between websites is no longer an important part of the search engine optimization process. In 2005, with their Jagger 2 update, Google stopped giving credit to reciprocal links as it does not indicate genuine link popularity.[9]

Blog and forum comments

[edit]

User-generated content such as blog and forum comments with links can drive valuable referral traffic if it's well-thought-out and pertains to the discussion of the post on the blog.[10] However, these links almost always contain the Nofollow or the newer ugc attribute which signal that Google shouldn't take these into its ranking considerations.[11]

[edit]

Website directories are lists of links to websites which are sorted into categories. Website owners can submit their site to many of these directories. Some directories accept payment for listing in their directory while others are free.

Social bookmarking

[edit]

Social bookmarking is a way of saving and categorizing web pages in a public location on the web. Because bookmarks have anchor text and are shared and stored publicly, they are scanned by search engine crawlers and have search engine optimization value.

Image linking

[edit]

Image linking is a way of submitting images, such as infographics, to image directories and linking them back to a specific URL.

Guest blogging

[edit]

Also known as guest posting, is a popular SEO technique that consists of writing a piece of content for another website with the goal of getting more visibility and possibly link back to the author's website. According to Google, such links are considered unnatural and should be generally containing the Nofollow attribute.[12]

[edit]

In early incarnations, when Google's algorithm relied on incoming links as an indicator of website success, Black Hat SEOs manipulated website rankings by creating link-building schemes, such as building subsidiary websites to send links to a primary website. With an abundance of incoming links, the prime website outranked many reputable sites. However, the conflicts of being devalued by major search engines while building links could be caused by web owners using other black hat strategies. Black hat link building refers explicitly to the process of acquiring as many links as possible with minimal effort.

The Penguin algorithm was created to eliminate this type of abuse. At the time, Google clarified its definition of a "bad" link: “Any links intended to manipulate a site’s ranking in Google search results may be considered part of a link scheme.”

With Penguin, it wasn't the quantity of links that improved a site's rankings but the quality. Since then, Google's web spam team has attempted to prevent the manipulation of their search results through link building. Major brands including J.C. Penney, BMW, Forbes, Overstock.com, and many others have received severe penalties to their search rankings for employing spammy and non-user friendly link building tactics.[13]

On October 5, 2014, Google launched a new algorithm update Penguin 3.0 to penalize those sites who use black hat link building tactics to build unnatural links to manipulate search engines. The update affected 0.3% English Language queries all over the world.[14]

Black hat SEO could also be referred to as Spamdexing, which utilizes other black SEO strategies and link building tactics.[15] Some black hat link building strategies include getting unqualified links from and participating in Link farm, link schemes and Doorway page.[6] Black Hat SEO could also refer to "negative SEO," the practice of deliberately harming another website's performance.

[edit]

White hat link building strategies are those strategies that add value to end users, abide by Google's term of service and produce good results that could be sustained for a long time. White hat link building strategies focus on producing high-quality as well as relevant links to the website. Although more difficult to acquire, white hat link building tactics are widely implemented by website owners because such kind of strategies are not only beneficial to their websites' long-term developments but also good to the overall online environment.

See also

[edit]
  • Deep linking: linking directly to a page within another website.
  • Inline linking: linking directly to content within another website.
  • Internal link: linking directly to content within your own website.
  • Overlinking
  • PageRank: an algorithm used by Google Search to rank websites in their search engine results.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Link Building Strategies You Need to Know | SEJ". searchenginejournal. Retrieved 10 February 2017.
  2. ^ Bailey, Matt (2011). Internet marketing : an hour a day (1st ed.). Indianapolis, Ind.: Wiley Technology Publishing. pp. 83–84. ISBN 978-0470633748. Retrieved 2 December 2014.
  3. ^ Rognerud, Jon (2011). Ultimate Guide to Search Engine Optimization Drive Traffic, Boost Conversion Rates, and Make Lots of Money (2nd ed.). New York: Entrepreneur Press. p. 213. ISBN 978-1613080207. Retrieved 2 December 2014.
  4. ^ "Link schemes" Google webmaster central
  5. ^ Oxer, Jonathan (2007). How to build a website and stay sane (2nd ed.). Lulu.com. p. 134. ISBN 978-1847997340. Retrieved 2 December 2014.[self-published source]
  6. ^ a b "Search Engine Optimization (SEO)" Google webmaster central
  7. ^ "Is That Directory Link Unnatural? | Search Engine Watch". searchenginewatch.com. Retrieved 14 March 2016.
  8. ^ Jerkovic, John I. (2010). SEO Warrior. Sebastopol: O'Reilly Media, Inc. p. 17. ISBN 978-1449383077. Retrieved 2 December 2014.
  9. ^ Webster, Ken. "Google's Jagger Update – Dust Begins to Settle?". WebProNews. iEntry Network. Archived from the original on 22 February 2014. Retrieved 24 February 2014.
  10. ^ Hines, Kristi. "How to Use Blog Commenting to Get Valuable Backlinks". Search Engine Watch. Retrieved 20 July 2016.
  11. ^ "Evolving "nofollow" – new ways to identify the nature of links". Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Retrieved 15 June 2020.
  12. ^ Southern, Matt (10 April 2020). "Google Answers: Is It OK to Link to My Own Guest Post?". Search Engine Journal. Retrieved 15 June 2020.
  13. ^ "10 Big Brands That Were Penalized By Google, From Rap Genius To The BBC". Marketing Land. Retrieved 21 April 2014.
  14. ^ Matt McGee. "Google Penguin Update 3 Released, Impacts 0.3% Of English-Language Queries", Retrieved on 17 February 2016.
  15. ^ Frick, Tim (2013). Return on Engagement: Content, Strategy and Design Techniques for Digital Marketing. Taylor & Francis. pp. 30–31. ISBN 978-1136030260. Retrieved 3 December 2014.
[edit]

Reviews for


Frequently Asked Questions

Small World Marketing works closely with clients' in-house teams, sharing insights and strategies to ensure both teams' efforts complement each other. They focus on open communication and joint planning to boost the SEO results effectively.

They implement strict data security measures and confidentiality agreements to protect client information during the SEO process. Regular audits and secure technology use ensure data remains safe, maintaining trust throughout their service delivery.

To ensure client privacy and security during SEO implementations, Small World Marketing adopts rigorous protocols. They're encrypting data, using secure connections, and conducting regular audits to protect digital assets from unauthorized access or breaches.